I know hes been talked up a lot on here but to me hes struggling to make any form of a decisive breakthrough.
I saw him play at Nottingham last Summer and thought he played ok but I am not sure he is a top 100 contender. I know hes had some injuries this year which will have stalled his progress somewhat but I was hoping for a better score today.
Happy to defer to others with better knowledge than I but the jury is still out for me right now.
I think it's difficult to properly assess Arthur. He was playing really well indoors last autumn and had some big scalps, but has been struggling to stay injury free. I think he's talented but is he going to get a proper run at it.
-- Edited by 9vicman on Monday 3rd of June 2024 06:13:30 PM
I didn't know that Greg Rusedski is coaching Ben Jones
He was very vocal from the sidelines - rather like you'd be with a 5 year-old - 'that's the way, well done, keep positive.....'
I hate that style of coaching ......
AND he had a little notebook in which he was doing old-fashioned point noting. Ridiculous. It's not even into an excel sheet or something - you can't do any data searches on it - you can't compare and contrast and run tests - it's just 1950s style coaching when there was no option
Ben, use your money (or your parents' money) more wisely
The standout match was Altmane v Mochizuki, a truly top-drawer, gob-smacking cracker
I initially thought you meant Greg was noting points of interest during the match, in which case I didn't see any big problem, especially if you didn't know what he waa going to do with these notes.. But do you mean he was literally recording each point as it was scored?!
The quality of hitting in Billy's match was tremendous. I had no idea that Billy was such a big guy. If he can maintain the level he showed today, he should win a decent haul of points this grass court season. The tie breaker was a close affair, but Billy had the better of the second set - I think four BPs in two games. If you are able to, watch the tb.
At one point in the second set, Shang took a fall. Not a heavy fall, but a fall nonetheless. He spent a couple of moments dusting himself off, brushing the grass from his arms and legs. He was given a time violation! I was shocked! Shang had a conversation with the umpire and thankfully the unpire announced "no time violation". I'm pleased that the umpire was able to listen to reason. Just a few games later, Shang got a code violation for ball abuse, there's no defence for that one! But he could have hit the ball, much, much harder. It landed on somebody's garden path, I'm sure it would have been more cathartic if he'd hit over their roof!
Without tickets for Centre (where Billy certainly seemed to get the biggest crowd and, no wonder, the biggest cheer at the end as he repeated last year's opening round win against the same player, though this year it was in R1 of the main draw instead of R1 of qualifying), I only saw two GB men play today.
The first was Harry Wendelken, who did well to keep both sets close against no. 2 Q seed Hüsler, though I only saw the 1st before heading off to the other side of the grounds to watch Naiktha and Ben, intending to come back again if it went to a decider.
Ben Jones v Alex Bolt was entertaining and noisier than the other matches around it in terms of players letting off steam after points. I stood just behind and to the left of someone who was making copious notes, didn't recognise him from the back of his head, but recognised him immediately once he opened his mouth. Take one point at a time, Keep it paahsitive, etc. Not bad advice under the circumstances, albeit very obvious! I originally thought he was just noting down things to talk about but he did seem to be scribbling after every point, so maybe he was doing a point-by-point. I must have been inches away from CD at some point if he noticed this too!
I get CD's point about not doing it electronically being very old-fashioned but maybe Greg just finds that any issues stick in his head more if he does that and had no intention of using it as his main post-match analysis tool - after all, they can view the whole video afterwards if they want to.
Clearly someone (mainly Ben himself, no doubt) is doing something right given the big improvement in his doubles ranking, his big win yesterday and his good performance against a strong Aussie today.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Seems a bit harsh. At least he is trying to give something back, unlike Henman.
Just me, but I'm assuming that Tim and Greg are both just doing a job. If Greg were doing it for free, or highly subsided, then true. And I don't know he's not. But, again, my assumption is that it's a regular job.
And Tim does a lot of charity work (and for free, generally, I believe) which is giving far more back than coaching one player for money
And, yes, Ben's made a lot of progress. Which has to be partly (or even mainly) down to Greg. No question. But that's normal - it's what you employ him for.
PS Nothing againt Greg - his 'platitudes' are just a question of style. Not a hanging offence . And his lack of IT savvy is a bit daft, if you compare it to others, but he's obviously a product of his own coaching and, again, not a biggie.
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 4th of June 2024 07:09:05 AM
In defence of Greg and to contrast coaching styles a certain well-known tennis coach appeared to be playing Candy Crush on his phone whilst the girls were warming up.
Also in defence of Greg, he also does charity work. And I think it's normal for coaches to charge for their services. I quite like the encouraging-style coaching. It seems refreshing compared to the dour, critical Jeremy Bates-style. Maybe he's tailoring it to Ben's personality and needs?