Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon wildcards


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 39782
Date:
RE: Wimbledon wildcards


Lambda wrote:

They have probably taken it from the appallingly written LTA news article.

"a wild card into the main draw at Wimbledon qualifying" disbelief


 The LTA seem to be very poor at writing clear articles. 



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Online
Posts: 2331
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

Madadman wrote:

www.lta.org.uk/49a242/siteassets/pro-players/wimbledon-wc-recommendations-policy-2024.pdf
LTA guidance on Wimbledon WCs. Says no ranking threshold and that the LTA will give AELTC up to 8 recommendations across both main and qualifying draws.


 Thanks Madadman - thats a new policy document, and in essence, leaves them free to recommend how they want! The 8 limit is interesting, given there are 17 in main and qualies in total, so do Wimbledon themselves have freedom on the other 9 or so?! 


That document has been around for a few years. They just change the year and resave it every year.

__________________


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1127
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Yes, it's nonsense (it's 'earned' him a quali wildcard - he can obviously still be given a MD wildcard - extremely unlikely but theoretcially possible)

But somewhat strange that Bonding hasn't got them to change it - that page is dated 30th April and he's obviously seen it


 I think he's got bigger things to worry about...



__________________


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1127
Date:

Also, I doubt very much the LTA would give as few as 8 suggestions for main draw/qualifying. The idea that they choose 8 and leave the Wimbledon committee to ponder over the pros and cons of Emily Appleton versus Amelia Rajecki.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54475
Date:

9vicman wrote:

Also, I doubt very much the LTA would give as few as 8 suggestions for main draw/qualifying. The idea that they choose 8 and leave the Wimbledon committee to ponder over the pros and cons of Emily Appleton versus Amelia Rajecki.


Yes, I agree

 



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 676
Date:

No Thiem but still a final WC to be announced

GENTLEMEN'S SINGLES

1 Liam BROADY (GBR)
2 Jan CHOINSKI (GBR)
3 Jacob FEARNLEY (GBR)
4 Arthur FERY (GBR)
5 Billy HARRIS (GBR)
6 Paul JUBB (GBR)
7 Henry SEARLE (GBR)
8 To be announced


GENTLEMEN'S DOUBLES


1 Liam BROADY (GBR) and Billy HARRIS (GBR)
2 Charles BROOM (GBR) and Arthur FERY (GBR)
3 Jay CLARKE (GBR) and Marcus WILLIS (GBR)
4 Daniel EVANS (GBR) and Henry SEARLE (GBR)
5 Jacob FEARNLEY (GBR) and Jack PINNINGTON JONES (GBR)

GENTLEMEN'S QUALIFYING SINGLES


1 Oliver BONDING (GBR)
2 Charles BROOM (GBR)
3 Jay CLARKE (GBR)
4 Felix GILL (GBR)
5 George LOFFHAGEN (GBR)
6 Jack PINNINGTON JONES (GBR)



-- Edited by Blue_Belle on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 09:20:25 AM

__________________

She/her



Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:

Paul jubb over Charles broom is wrong in my opinion other than that I am happy

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:

I believe the final wild card is for the winner at ilkley

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 19368
Date:

Jay And Marcus back in action together. Hoping they can gel and match their feats of beating Mahut/PHH a few years back.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Online
Posts: 2552
Date:

twentytoone wrote:

Paul jubb over Charles broom is wrong in my opinion other than that I am happy


 What on earth has Paul Jubb done to merit a Wild Card in this years draw?



__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 676
Date:

twentytoone wrote:

Paul jubb over Charles broom is wrong in my opinion other than that I am happy


Based in current form perhaps. But Paul has been super unlucky with injuries and let's face it, a rare British non white player. 

As much as I like Liam, he's only just coming back from injury and then a concussion. 

The Dan/Henry doubles could be over before it gets going as well. 



__________________

She/her



Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9199
Date:

Ryan a bit unlucky as well.

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3748
Date:

Ryan being a direct entrance to Qualifying and not with a MD wildcard I can sort of understand but also feel like is a bit unlucky as he was injured. However when was the last time we had a British player in qualifying without a wildcard. Cant happen that often.

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 444
Date:

Broom missing does feel wrong, especially given his current ranking. Any other year, a grass 125K British finalist would have definitely made this list. Shame for Ryan, but glad he has direct entry into qualies. I think we could have a couple of qualifiers on the mens side

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Online
Posts: 2552
Date:

Blue_Belle wrote:
twentytoone wrote:

Paul jubb over Charles broom is wrong in my opinion other than that I am happy


Based in current form perhaps. But Paul has been super unlucky with injuries and let's face it, a rare British non white player. 

As much as I like Liam, he's only just coming back from injury and then a concussion. 

The Dan/Henry doubles could be over before it gets going as well. 


 Do you think that is an acceptable reason for a player (good chap though I am sure Paul is) to be awarded a £60k Wild Card over players such as Charles (great recent form) or Ryan (superb past Grass court form and also returning from injuries)?

 

Or Jay Clarke receiving a Qualies one (over Ryan again) when he has not even played on Grass this season?



__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)

«First  <  15 6 7 8 913  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard