I have the impression that Hannah is making a lot of unforced errors, trying to force winners that arent really there, on clay, against this quality of opponent.
shes playing a much older experienced player, and it shows a bit. Just trying a bit too hard, but that serve is becoming a bit of an issue and maybe needs some work before the FO Juniors. Seems to be a common weakness amongst youngsters, then they get it right. Remember Coco had some nightmares with her serve.
Just wrote summat that disappeared, agreeing and citing that she had 8DFs in her first 7 service game, was panicking if a rally went beyond 5 shots and trying to end it, allowing Pazcek to dominate the scoreline by simply getting the ball back in court...
I think its a J300, then a J500 and then RG, all on clay.
Over the longer term, it would be good for Hannah if she doesnt end up in the same place as Katie B in a decade's time - made the WTA top 40 and suddenly you have to play Madrid, Rome, RG on clay, or come to a standstill for 2 important months of a 10 month season. Better get the clay practice and coaching, and add to your skillset aged 15 than as a novice in your mid to late twenties.
I think she has the tools to become a great clay courter (almost as good as grass and hard (maybe the same level)). There were glimpses of the type of shots and style in today's match. Needs the right guidance though to continue to develop!
So she lost 2-6, 3-6, sorta trying to play grass court tennis on a clay court.
I wonder what grass court tennis is these days with the slowing of the courts. Was she trying to be ultra aggressive (ala Katie Boulter at Billie Jean King Cup)?
as a point developed, hannah starts quickly trying to hit clean winners, unlikely dropshots, or at least put Tamira at a big disadvantage...
tamira wins quite lot of points with fairly neutral shots landing close to the T - invitations for hannah to have another punt, at 50/50 odds on whether hannah either goes long or finds the net.
Give Hannah a break. This was a development event for her. A chance to try various things against quality opposition (comparative to the alternatives in juniors this week). Her focus in this swing is Junior Roland Garros and what she did this week, and maybe in the J300 next week, is learning in preparation for that and the J500 beforehand.
Interesting. What you say there after the first sentence makes sense. I don't though see any issues with wimbledont's observations of the match - not that I saw the match myself.
I assume almost all of us take the fact that development should be, and no doubt is, Hannah's #1 focus ( and at times more particularly so ) while not necessarily always mentioning it.
Though actually, from above, how much was she altering / trying to alter her normal game in this instance? I thought there was a bit of an underlying suggestion that she could / should arguably have been doing more in that regard.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 9th of May 2024 08:29:03 PM