I had to smile at the Beeb's gaffe. That said, on the evidence of the linguistic abominations I regularly see perpetrated by its journalists (generally the younger ones!) on the news site, but which are never acknowledged (are their reports subject to sub-editing?), I'm not sure it should be drawing attention to its ignorance in such a way.
A prime example from the current home page:
Jailed cancer charity thief ordered to pay back rest of £95,000 she defrauded
How on earth do you defraud money as opposed to a person, a bank, HMRC or some other institution? The journo responsible for it was obviously too damned lazy to type "obtained by fraud" instead - two words too many!
And here's another one! I had absolutely no idea that trees could be said to possess special abilities in a particular area & I am sick to death of seeing "gift" used as a synonym for the verb from it is formed.
And yet another one, the plonker who wrote it obviously too thick to realise that it's open to misinterpretation or, if he or she does, too lazy to type "Woman's heartache as search for mother's body goes on", which is unequivocal.
I had to smile at the Beeb's gaffe. That said, on the evidence of the linguistic abominations I regularly see perpetrated by its journalists (generally the younger ones!) on the news site, but which are never acknowledged (are their reports subject to sub-editing?), I'm not sure it should be drawing attention to its ignorance in such a way.
A prime example from the current home page:
Jailed cancer charity thief ordered to pay back rest of £95,000 she defrauded
How on earth do you defraud money as opposed to a person, a bank, HMRC or some other institution? The journo responsible for it was obviously too damned lazy to type "obtained by fraud" instead - two words too many!
And here's another one! I had absolutely no idea that trees could be said to possess special abilities in a particular area & I am sick to death of seeing "gift" used as a synonym for the verb from it is formed.
And yet another one, the plonker who wrote it obviously too thick to realise that it's open to misinterpretation or, if he or she does, too lazy to type "Woman's heartache as search for mother's body goes on", which is unequivocal.
Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:
1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.
I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb. Why that "to"? What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?
2) Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.
"ended up to be"? Most people would say "ended up being"! What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?
-- Edited by Stircrazy on Saturday 4th of January 2025 05:58:40 PM
Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:
1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.
I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb. Why that "to"? What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?
2) Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.
"ended up to be"? Most people would say "ended up being"! What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?
Two more pig-ignorant BBC journos: "Wife calls to ban gambling ads after husband's £85k debt". Why couldn't whichever of them was responsible for writing it have said "Woman calls for ban on gambling ads...". Lazy/semi-literate sods!
Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:
1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.
I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb. Why that "to"? What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?
2) Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.
"ended up to be"? Most people would say "ended up being"! What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?
Two more pig-ignorant BBC journos: "Wife calls to ban gambling ads after husband's £85k debt". Why couldn't whichever of them was responsible for writing it have said "Woman calls for ban on gambling ads...". Lazy/semi-literate sods!
What a load of old cobblers! And I completely missed this little whizzer in Metro in last month. "Softer", "more visually appealing"?!! Give me strength! It's not just Gen Z, either. It's intensely irritating to see the media insist on referring to the "Prime Minister", other members of the government & all professional titles without using upper case initial letters. That's been going on for some time.
I see that the Grauniad journo is under the impression that there's such a verb as "lowercase"! It's bad enough seeing it spelt as one word as a noun.