Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The weird & wonderful world of English grammar...


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 56323
Date:
The weird & wonderful world of English grammar...


That actually is a really clunky headline - EVEN IF you were happy to accept the words used in that way

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

I had to smile at the Beeb's gaffe.  That said, on the evidence of the linguistic abominations I regularly see perpetrated by its journalists (generally the younger ones!) on the news site, but which are never acknowledged (are their reports subject to sub-editing?), I'm not sure it should be drawing attention to its ignorance in such a way. 


A prime example from the current home page:

Jailed cancer charity thief ordered to pay back rest of £95,000 she defrauded

How on earth do you defraud money as opposed to a person, a bank, HMRC or some other institution?  confuse  The journo responsible for it was obviously too damned lazy to type "obtained by fraud" instead - two words too many!  no


And here's another one!  I had absolutely no idea that trees could be said to possess special abilities in a particular area & I am sick to death of seeing "gift" used as a synonym for the verb from it is formed.  furious


And yet another one, the plonker who wrote it obviously too thick to realise that it's open to misinterpretation or, if he or she does, too lazy to type "Woman's heartache as search for mother's body goes on", which is unequivocal.  furious



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1892
Date:

Two years of being body searched would be a cause for grieving, though.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

christ wrote:

Two years of being body searched would be a cause for grieving, though.


Can't argue with that.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

I had to smile at the Beeb's gaffe.  That said, on the evidence of the linguistic abominations I regularly see perpetrated by its journalists (generally the younger ones!) on the news site, but which are never acknowledged (are their reports subject to sub-editing?), I'm not sure it should be drawing attention to its ignorance in such a way. 


A prime example from the current home page:

Jailed cancer charity thief ordered to pay back rest of £95,000 she defrauded

How on earth do you defraud money as opposed to a person, a bank, HMRC or some other institution?  confuse  The journo responsible for it was obviously too damned lazy to type "obtained by fraud" instead - two words too many!  no


And here's another one!  I had absolutely no idea that trees could be said to possess special abilities in a particular area & I am sick to death of seeing "gift" used as a synonym for the verb from it is formed.  furious


And yet another one, the plonker who wrote it obviously too thick to realise that it's open to misinterpretation or, if he or she does, too lazy to type "Woman's heartache as search for mother's body goes on", which is unequivocal.  furious


Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:

1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.

I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb.  Why that "to"?  confuse  What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?

2)  Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.

"ended up to be"?  Most people would say "ended up being"!  no  What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?



-- Edited by Stircrazy on Saturday 4th of January 2025 05:58:40 PM

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1892
Date:

"given"?

 

(Cheap shot - sorry!)



-- Edited by christ on Saturday 4th of January 2025 10:20:44 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:

1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.

I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb.  Why that "to"?  confuse  What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?

2)  Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.

"ended up to be"?  Most people would say "ended up being"!  no  What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?


Two more pig-ignorant BBC journos:  "Wife calls to ban gambling ads after husband's £85k debt".  Why couldn't whichever of them was responsible for writing it have said "Woman calls for ban on gambling ads...".  Lazy/semi-literate sods!

The article from which it's taken.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

Two more for the collection from the live article on the yellow/amber weather warnings for the weekend:

1) Meanwhile, National Highways suggests travellers to delay their journeys if they can.

I'm noticing that clumsy, ungrammatical construction more & more now & it's by no means confined to the Beeb.  Why that "to"?  confuse  What was wrong with "National Highway suggests travellers delay their journeys", ideally with a "that" between "suggests" & "travellers"?

2)  Many of us have experienced the disappointment of putting sledges away after predictions of snowfall ended up to be just more rain.

"ended up to be"?  Most people would say "ended up being"!  no  What do they teach kids in English classes these days - assuming English classes are in fact still given?


Two more pig-ignorant BBC journos:  "Wife calls to ban gambling ads after husband's £85k debt".  Why couldn't whichever of them was responsible for writing it have said "Woman calls for ban on gambling ads...".  Lazy/semi-literate sods!

The article from which it's taken.


And the Beeb also appears to believe that "tariff" is a verb!  furious



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 59423
Date:

What a load of old cobblers!  And I completely missed this little whizzer in Metro in last month.  "Softer", "more visually appealing"?!!  Give me strength!  It's not just Gen Z, either.  It's intensely irritating to see the media insist on referring to the "Prime Minister", other members of the government & all professional titles without using upper case initial letters.  That's been going on for some time.  no

I see that the Grauniad journo is under the impression that there's such a verb as "lowercase"!  disbelief  It's bad enough seeing it spelt as one word as a noun.  furious



__________________
«First  <  16 7 8 | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard