British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The weird & wonderful world of English grammar...


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 44840
Date:
The weird & wonderful world of English grammar...


Try googling "to rebuke a remark" and see what AI thinks. Probably says more about Google AI ! ( and / or Americanisms - which tbf I generally don't have as much trouble with as some but maybe the Beeb should have more trouble ).



-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 27th of May 2026 07:25:41 PM



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 68639
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Do you think they meant 'refuted'?

It's quite common to use a word that sounds similar - a word slip (which I can forgive in spoken language but is not forgiveable in a written text, from a journalist)


Not beyond the realms of possibility.  I wouldn't have batted an eyelid at that or "rejected".

On the second point, I've been rewatching past episodes of Grantchester on ITV3 (at the moment Series 10, episode 8).  IMHO, the scriptwriters of most historical TV series have tin ears when it comes to "period" dialogue & repeatedly allow neologisms to invade their scripts (even Anthony Horowitz, responsible for most of the scripts of the excellent Foyle's War, seemed incapable of preventing the incursion of the ghastly "hopefully").  This one was written by Daisy Coulam, one of the worst offenders (along with Rachel Flowerday - cf. the otherwise enjoyable Father Brown stories).  It wasn't a neologism on this occasion, but a "word slip":  she had Robson Green's character, Geordie Keating, referring to fascist language that should be "resigned" to the annals of history...



__________________
«First  <  111 12 13 | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard