Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 3 & 4 - Australian Open Grand Slam - Melbourne, Australia Hard


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1320
Date:
RE: Week 3 & 4 - Australian Open Grand Slam - Melbourne, Australia Hard


If the likes of Krunic, Rogers Tomljanovic and Kerber had  not used protected rankings then Yastremska would have had direct entry. Mentioning Stevenson at  Wimbledon in 1999 she was an amateur at the time and beat another qualifier Jelena Dokic in the quarter finals before being outclassed by Lindsay Davenport in the semis. Although she has been around for what seems a long time Yastremska is actually younger than Svitolina was when she reached her first Grand Slam semi final. 



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1223
Date:

Andy Parker wrote:
Brendan F wrote:
adz1983 wrote:
Brendan F wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

Yastremska (which my spell check is trying to change to tastemaker) gets to the semis as a qualifier. As a qualifier ever reached a final?


 I just saw a list of qualifiers who reached the semis in the open era. She's the third in the last 4 years. It had only happened twice before 2020.


 Do you have the list?


 It was a Facebook post which I can't remember the source. It was Nadia Podoroska and Alexandra Stevenson along with Emma and Yastremska,the other one was in the 70s and someone I'd not heard of.


 I have seen the article you mention and  the list is Christine Dorey Aussie Open semi finals 1978, Alexandra Stevenson Wimbledon  semi finals 1999, Nadia Podoroska French semi finals 2020, Emma Raducanu won US Open 2021 and now Yastremska here.

Christine Dorey had a great year in 1977, playing in all the Slams and made the quarter finals at Roland Garros, but after her Aussie Open semi final, she had injury problems I think and later played as Christine Matison.  I seem to very vaguely remember seeing her play in 1978 at Wimbledon, which was the year that Tom Okker made the semi finals of the men's as a wildcard entrant.



-- Edited by Andy Parker on Wednesday 24th of January 2024 11:16:10 PM


She actually played as Christine Matison (Dorey is her married name), and was in action as recently as 2012 in the ITF Seniors World Champs. Without minimising her achievements, the Australian Open entry was very weak in the mid 70s, so not comparable to Stevenson and company.

Yastremska of course has been ranked as high as No. 21, so not a traditional qualifier. But an amazing effort considering all she has gone through, firstly with the provisional doping suspension (later overturned) and then fleeing from Ukraine.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41476
Date:

9vicman wrote:
Andy Parker wrote:
Brendan F wrote:
adz1983 wrote:
Brendan F wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

Yastremska (which my spell check is trying to change to tastemaker) gets to the semis as a qualifier. As a qualifier ever reached a final?


 I just saw a list of qualifiers who reached the semis in the open era. She's the third in the last 4 years. It had only happened twice before 2020.


 Do you have the list?


 It was a Facebook post which I can't remember the source. It was Nadia Podoroska and Alexandra Stevenson along with Emma and Yastremska,the other one was in the 70s and someone I'd not heard of.


 I have seen the article you mention and  the list is Christine Dorey Aussie Open semi finals 1978, Alexandra Stevenson Wimbledon  semi finals 1999, Nadia Podoroska French semi finals 2020, Emma Raducanu won US Open 2021 and now Yastremska here.

Christine Dorey had a great year in 1977, playing in all the Slams and made the quarter finals at Roland Garros, but after her Aussie Open semi final, she had injury problems I think and later played as Christine Matison.  I seem to very vaguely remember seeing her play in 1978 at Wimbledon, which was the year that Tom Okker made the semi finals of the men's as a wildcard entrant.



-- Edited by Andy Parker on Wednesday 24th of January 2024 11:16:10 PM


She actually played as Christine Matison (Dorey is her married name), and was in action as recently as 2012 in the ITF Seniors World Champs. Without minimising her achievements, the Australian Open entry was very weak in the mid 70s, so not comparable to Stevenson and company.

Yastremska of course has been ranked as high as No. 21, so not a traditional qualifier. But an amazing effort considering all she has gone through, firstly with the provisional doping suspension (later overturned) and then fleeing from Ukraine.


 1978 was only a 32 player draw as well. Sue Barker should have won that year, she was top seed, and went out in the last 8. The winner, Chris O'Neill, was unseeded and I dont think won anything else of interest in her career!!

I remember the year, though, because Guillermo Vilas won on grass, one of two times, which was completely counter expectations given his game style!



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1320
Date:

Zheng backing up beating Katie by reaching the final.



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1320
Date:

GAMEOVER wrote:

Zheng backing up beating Katie by reaching the final.


 Katie was also the highest ranked player Zheng beat on the way to the final.



__________________
Var


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1179
Date:

GAMEOVER wrote:
GAMEOVER wrote:

Zheng backing up beating Katie by reaching the final.


 Katie was also the highest ranked player Zheng beat on the way to the final.


 Gameover, I think that lack of higher seeded opposition showed today. 



__________________
VRoberts


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2174
Date:

Happy for Sabalenka.

I know shes young but cant see Zheng in another slam final.

__________________

GO TEAM GBR IN 2024!

Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Online
Posts: 7919
Date:

Sabalenka played so well and was the deserved winner, but I tend to support the non-grunter in matches where I'm not particularly bothered about the outcome!

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 750
Date:

Outgunned.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18077
Date:

For most of the match Zheng was winning a very creditable 70% on her first serve but Sabalenka was winning 95%. It was only in the last few games that Zheng started to win a few more points on Sabalenka's 1st serve but by then it was too late.


__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1320
Date:

Radio commentary said Sabalenka's serve was never broken in the tournament. 



__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 315
Date:

GAMEOVER wrote:

Radio commentary said Sabalenka's serve was never broken in the tournament. 


 The radio commentator is incorrect. 

Gauff did at least a couple of times.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23242
Date:

Deucebag wrote:
GAMEOVER wrote:

Radio commentary said Sabalenka's serve was never broken in the tournament. 


 The radio commentator is incorrect. 

Gauff did at least a couple of times.


 Yes, Coco managed 3 breaks in that match (but lost her serve 4 times). But Sabalenka didn't lose a single set.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41476
Date:

Player of the Month votes now live

britishtennis.activeboard.com/t70367596/january-2024-player-of-the-month-vote-semifinal-group-1/

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1320
Date:

Mervatron2 wrote:

Happy for Sabalenka.

I know shes young but cant see Zheng in another slam final.


 Not so sure about that now as Zheng has won the Olympics singles  and is a WTA singles  final finalist in 2024.



-- Edited by GAMEOVER on Saturday 9th of November 2024 09:48:05 AM

__________________
«First  <  110 11 12 13  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard