johnnylad wrote: I would replace Arvind Parmar as he has the most chance of qualifying by rights
That would be my choice aswell.
I how Greg's baby will change his scheduling this year, eg: do you think he'll go straight from Wimbledon to Newport this year as that would probably mean spending about 7-8 weeks away from his family ?
UltimateSlabbaFan wrote: Who would you replace from that list to give a wildcard to Greg ?
Now think very carefully about your answer
I cant think of it.
Its not about being careful. I always give my opinion.
But in this case I dont have one. But Greg must be given one. Our only Grand Slam finalist in the Open Era..... surely he deserves every bit of help he can.
The Surbiton wildcards will be announced sometime next week, the LTA said that they'd wait for results from and during the French before deciding.
With very few of our top 20 players competing next week, I presume they're waiting to see if Rusedski, Henman or Murray lose early in the French and then request a Surbiton wildcard to prepare for Queens.
Out of interest, when was the last time Henman played at Surbiton ?
Greg has played the tournament quite regularly over the last few years, the amazing thing is that he's never won it. Considering how fast the courts are there, that really shows how strong the Surbiton field usually is. It ought to be upgraded from 50K [which is a bottom level challenger].
50Ks and 25K+Hs are the lowest tier of challenger events, they both offer the same points. 50Ks offer more prize money, 25K+Hs offer less prize money but they offer hospitality eg: airport pickups, hotel paid for etc.
it just shows how cheap they are, they could easily up the prize money but wont, they know that in all likley hood it wouldnt attract a stronger field anyway due to its timing.
compare to belgrade, they had a great event and staright away uped the prize money cause they were proud of it.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
5 top hundred players and 12 inside top 115 is very strong for almost any challenger isnt it, bar sunrise.
i have no idea who is in charge of deciding the lvls. i had assumed the lta foots the bill for the prize money, the sponsers just help make the difference up on the smaller events, on stella/nottingham atp i would epxect the sponsors to pay.
i think the lta were the ones who decided to srcap the british tour and put all those futures on so i guess they pay for them there.
edit: in the past hasn't surbition just had live game scores, not points. its betetr then nothign i guess.
i think its not too difficult to do real live scores, i think they just hook it up to the umpires little machine thingy or the main score boards (which his why somethimes the scores correct if he/she press the wrong button)
-- Edited by Count Zero at 16:53, 2006-05-25
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
I agree RJA, they should make Surbiton 125K or at the very least 100K.
Unlike other British challengers Surbiton actually gets quite a large number of spectators and apart from qualies which are free, you have to pay £8 for a ticket so the tournament must make quite a bit of dosh from that.
The British tour still runs Count Zero, there aren't many events though, did there used to be more ?
Surbiton had live game scores up until last year and they promised to have them this year. As Count says, it's not that good but at least there are live scores.
Andy would have to have a wildcard, but I doubt if he will be asking for one. He needs to sort out this back problem before Queens and playing Surbiton would surely not be a good idea.
Andy would have to have a wildcard, but I doubt if he will be asking for one. He needs to sort out this back problem before Queens and playing Surbiton would surely not be a good idea.
Does anyone know if any TV channel has ever tried to cover Surbiton ?
I just wondered as in terms of publicity it gets much more than any other British challenger and virtually as much as Queens and ATP Nottingham. It's like an ATP event in that its covered by getty images, there are newspaper reports and player quotes, live scores plus a really great website with proper match reports.
The only thing really missing [apart from point-by-point scores] is TV coverage.
-- Edited by UltimateSlabbaFan at 15:41, 2006-05-31