Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 43 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
RE: Week 43 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


Lily lost 2-6 3-6 cry



__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 803
Date:

Sealed with an ace. Mimi wins 6/3 6/2, her forehand is lethal - I lost count of how many winners she hit on that side in set 2. Hannah was misfiring a fair bit, great week for both.

__________________
Come on brits :D


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1857
Date:

Mimi seemed more up for the match than Hannah who seemed dispirited

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 276
Date:

Think Hannah wished she'd been the one playing Mona Barthel instead of Lily. Mimi has just got her number somehow.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 240
Date:

Mingge the merciless



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23256
Date:

I didn't see any of the match but the stats on second serve give an indication. Hannah won just 3 points from 21 second serves with 6 DF, so Mimi must have been all over the serve.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41496
Date:

Brendan F wrote:

Mingge the merciless


 Yep, the Mingge Dynasty is maybe upon us! 



__________________
Var


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1180
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Brendan F wrote:

Mingge the merciless


 Yep, the Mingge Dynasty is maybe upon us! 


 Well most probably no one knows Hannahs game as well as Mimi so I dont think Hannah should be too disheartened. She had still had a good week. More ranking points. Mimi perhaps needed the points more. 



-- Edited by Var on Friday 27th of October 2023 12:39:34 PM

__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55271
Date:

Only saw the first set of Mimi/Hannah
Hannah was SO off kilter with her serve - first and second. So many throw-ups of the ball. DFs. Missed first serves. TBH, Mimi's wasn't hugely better but Hannah looked tight beyong belief. She looked worried, and then resigned. None of the positive energy playing against the big names.
Really doesn't matter. Great run for Mimi (and still going).

__________________
Var


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1180
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Only saw the first set of Mimi/Hannah
Hannah was SO off kilter with her serve - first and second. So many throw-ups of the ball. DFs. Missed first serves. TBH, Mimi's wasn't hugely better but Hannah looked tight beyong belief. She looked worried, and then resigned. None of the positive energy playing against the big names.
Really doesn't matter. Great run for Mimi (and still going).


 I watched the second set and Mimi just outgunned her too much power.



__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18078
Date:

Mimi was like a little bundle of energy, racing around the court, taking the serves early and rushing to the net.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40763
Date:

Very good  biggrin

May Hannah and Mimi continue to inspire each other.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55271
Date:

Var wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Only saw the first set of Mimi/Hannah
Hannah was SO off kilter with her serve - first and second. So many throw-ups of the ball. DFs. Missed first serves. TBH, Mimi's wasn't hugely better but Hannah looked tight beyong belief. She looked worried, and then resigned. None of the positive energy playing against the big names.
Really doesn't matter. Great run for Mimi (and still going).


 I watched the second set and Mimi just outgunned her too much power.


 Yes, but having just talked to someone up there, who knows them both, Hannah was well off from normal, which is partly thanks to Mimi, of course, but just was not hitting through the ball like she normally does, very tight armed, and so was always on the back foot. There's obviously a big mental element to that. Which seemingly her camp expected.  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18078
Date:

QF: XU, Mingge (GBR) Q 1228 def KLUGMAN, Hannah (GBR) WC 734 6-3 6-2
QF: MIYAZAKI, Yuriko Lily (GBR) (4) 191 lost to BATHEL, Mona (GER) 277 2-6 3-6
QF: DART, Harriet (GBR) (2) 144 def BROGAN, Anna (GBR) WC 344 6-3 6-2

SF: XU, Mingge (GBR) Q 1228 (CH=1033 2023) {16yo JCH=14} v BATHEL, Mona (GER) 277 (CH=23 2013)
SF: DART, Harriet (GBR) (2) 144 (CH=84 2022) v SNIGUR, Daria (UKR) (3) 133 (CH=105 2022)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18078
Date:

Is anyone else having trouble with the ITF site or is it just me? It gives the Fact Sheet for each event but no information on Acceptance List, Draws and Results or Order of Play.

__________________
«First  <  115 16 17 18 19 20  >  Last»  | Page of 20  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard