Its a shame first of all Jodie and now Katie cant perform well when the world is watching. Missing a certain mentality unfortunately. Still time for Katie though come on!!
I agree with Paul
Katie is not freezing in the headlights
She's playing her level
She just can't play her game against the heavy deep balls of rybakina
There's nothing wrong with her mental game
I respectfully disagree. 1st serve way down, shot selection (when she has them) questionabl. But her fighting spirit is always there I will always be a Katie Boulter fan.
Yep. Of course she could have made a few more first serves. But that wasn't really the issue. It wouldn't have changed much. And was partly a reflection of her fear of the return anyway. And, yes, there were a few poor shot selections. But she made quite a lot of poor shot selections in her previous matches too. The problem is she didn't get punished in the same way in those ones. She simply didn't have the time to play the right shots, she was constantly foreshortened in everything she was doing.
So, playing the defending champion, with a huge difference in ranking, I think she put out a very reasonable performance. And, yes, unlike a few other players or doubles teams who really played poor matches, given their opponent's level
I'm inclined to agree with markymc1983, in that Katie felt the weight of expectation on her shoulders. She had a bad experience last year against Tan, and I'm sure she desperately wanted to put up a good performance. Unfortunately, as people are saying Rybakina is a class act, and you're not going to be able to dent her game unless you're playing your best tennis in a fearless frame of mind. Boulter can play much better than her showing this evening, but the odds were that it was unlikely to happen in the pressure cooker situation. Once things started to slide, all the pressure was on Boulter, and nerves began to detract from her game. It's not a failing, it's more a lack of experience playing top players. Rybakina was the heavy favourite, but Boulter playing at her best could have pushed her opponent a bit more than we saw tonight.
There's nowhere to hide on a tennis court when it's not your day. Tonight's match though doesn't cloud the excellent progress that Boulter has made over the last couple of months.
It baffles me as to why interviewers are still standing so far away from the players they're interviewing. Social distancing stopped being a requirement a long time ago.
Kenin showed everyone how to combat a powerful opponent, in beating Gauff. Never just hit it back to the same spot, instead make your opponent move from the get-go, and keep them on the run, every shot. Don't let them plant their feet, and use that power. Put them under pressure to make shots on the move, and watch their game crumble instead of yours.
-- Edited by foobarbaz on Saturday 8th of July 2023 10:12:06 PM
Kenin showed everyone how to combat a powerful opponent, in beating Gauff. Never just hit it back to the same spot, instead make your opponent move from the get-go, and keep them on the run, every shot. Don't let them plant their feet, and use that power. Put them under pressure to make shots on the move, and watch their game crumble instead of yours.
-- Edited by foobarbaz on Saturday 8th of July 2023 10:12:06 PM
Kenin is a Grand Slam winner.
No one managed last year to put that plan into action against Rybakina. And everyone tried, even the very best. So I guess it's no disgrace that Katie didn't either.
If you look at Katie's results against elite players with big serves and heavy groundstrokes, she has typically lost in 3 sets, though did beat Karolina Pliskova twice on grass in 2022. Assuming Rybakina is performing at a higher level, you might reasonably expect a 3-6 4-6 or 2-6 3-6 scoreline, rather than 1-6 1-6. From memory, I thought Katie looked a decent player in many of the matches listed below. The Rybakina match falls in the same category as the Samsonova match at the US Open, in that Katie was out-classed.
Kenin showed everyone how to combat a powerful opponent, in beating Gauff. Never just hit it back to the same spot, instead make your opponent move from the get-go, and keep them on the run, every shot. Don't let them plant their feet, and use that power. Put them under pressure to make shots on the move, and watch their game crumble instead of yours.
-- Edited by foobarbaz on Saturday 8th of July 2023 10:12:06 PM
Kenin is a Grand Slam winner.
No one managed last year to put that plan into action against Rybakina. And everyone tried, even the very best. So I guess it's no disgrace that Katie didn't either.
I agree with this. Kenin has been largely playing top 50/top 100 players this year. Katie has been playing largely top 200-500. There's a massive gulf in class of opponent. I thought there were a few occasions where Katie would have won the point at a lower level match, simply by setting up a good point and putting her final shot into court when Rybakina was slightly out of position. At this level. those balls come back to you, so you have to acclimatise to that. I think if she had had the chance to regularly play top 50/100 players she would have been much more competitive.
She didn't look like she mentally folded to me. Her serve didn't collapse. She wasn't duffing it in the net. Rybakina just played at a different level.
It baffles me as to why interviewers are still standing so far away from the players they're interviewing. Social distancing stopped being a requirement a long time ago.
I know....its been baffling me too
It would be more baffling when they both have microphones why they would be required to stand right next to each other
It baffles me as to why interviewers are still standing so far away from the players they're interviewing. Social distancing stopped being a requirement a long time ago.
I know....its been baffling me too
It would be more baffling when they both have microphones why they would be required to stand right next to each other
I guess personal space is one thing weve learnt from this past few years - game shows like Would I Lie to You or Question of Sport separated the panels and have maintained the seating gaps with separate booths , whereas before Covid theyd be at the same table.
I think it makes sense personally, particularly with different countries having different perspectives. In Jamaica recently, we still wore masks in the airport and distanced in security, this was in March.
The last 16 of the womens singles has a very strong lineup with many high seeds left, a lot more of the seeds intact than other recent slams over the past few years - bodes for an interesting second week. Swiatek seems to have got to that stage with fewest games lost in three matches and would appear the favourite but anyone can win this still.
It's worth noting that of the seven matches yesterday in the women's singles, only one went to three sets (Jabeur-Andreescu) and five were over in five or fewer games.
Katie may have been outplayed but she was far from the only one.
Kenin showed everyone how to combat a powerful opponent, in beating Gauff. Never just hit it back to the same spot, instead make your opponent move from the get-go, and keep them on the run, every shot. Don't let them plant their feet, and use that power. Put them under pressure to make shots on the move, and watch their game crumble instead of yours.
-- Edited by foobarbaz on Saturday 8th of July 2023 10:12:06 PM
Kenin is a Grand Slam winner.
No one managed last year to put that plan into action against Rybakina. And everyone tried, even the very best. So I guess it's no disgrace that Katie didn't either.
I agree with this. Kenin has been largely playing top 50/top 100 players this year. Katie has been playing largely top 200-500. There's a massive gulf in class of opponent. I thought there were a few occasions where Katie would have won the point at a lower level match, simply by setting up a good point and putting her final shot into court when Rybakina was slightly out of position. At this level. those balls come back to you, so you have to acclimatise to that. I think if she had had the chance to regularly play top 50/100 players she would have been much more competitive.
She didn't look like she mentally folded to me. Her serve didn't collapse. She wasn't duffing it in the net. Rybakina just played at a different level.
Yes. Everyone said the same thing when she lost to Martic at Eastbourne. i was there and although she won more games, the match wasnt nearly as close as the score suggested. It never felt as if she has a chance of winning.
It baffles me as to why interviewers are still standing so far away from the players they're interviewing. Social distancing stopped being a requirement a long time ago.
I know....its been baffling me too
It would be more baffling when they both have microphones why they would be required to stand right next to each other
It just looks weird for the TV shot, that's all, especially when all the other interviewers are all cosying up to each other. But I've no major problem with it They can stand wherever they want.
People are saying (quite rightly) Katie has been playing lower level players, and it really shows.
And I guess matches are different from practice.
But nearly all women have male hitting partners. Exactly for this purpose. So they're used to a heavy, harder ball.
So it does suprise me a little when Katie (and others) are clearly caught out by the hard return of serve right at them, for instance. Katie (unlike Kenin, say) does not have a compact game, where she uses her legs well for stability. She's all big arm swing, and high centre of gravity. Again, unlike Kenin. Which is a problem if the opponent is getting the first strike and you're on the back foot. But with a male hitting partner that is very easy to replicate in practice. But, again, if it were that easy, I guess everyone would have 'learnt' how to