Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 15 - ITF W60 - Chiasso, Switzerland Clay


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 492
Date:
RE: Week 15 - ITF W60 - Chiasso, Switzerland Clay


Coup Droit wrote:

I guess the problem, foo, is that she wasn't playing like that before in the match - so it's not really the mentality overall that's the problem.

Before the end of the third set, she was constructing points well, playing good clay court tennis.

I think it was just the tension and stress that got to her.

And that's SO difficult to coach because you can't replicate it for real.

Also, she's a player that relies heavily on her serve (it's about her best shot) - not to win the point as such but to set herself off in the point. And when the serve goes, the rest of her game goes down the tube. (Unlike players with weak serves who know their serve is going to be dodgy). And it's a vicious circle coz it ratttled her and then it got even worse.

So, yes, I think there's coaching to be done, but more on 'what to do when your serve looks like it's deserted you'

She also needs to come in, jsut a little more, IMO. She stood off, and got herself in trouble.


 Some good points there CD, and true I didn't see all the good play that must have gone on for the score to be 5-2 in the 3rd. As the Bene Gesserit may have said, "Fear is the mind killer", though we are only talking of a 1st Qualifying Round match, not a Main Draw quarter-final or something. Not being able to keep perspective, and control the emotions in such a match, in order to play purposeful tennis until the end - that's a problem that needs to be addressed. Losing a match when playing well, that's ok and plus-points can be carried forward to the next match. There wasn't much that could be taken from the match yesterday, because it's the business end of the match that counts for so much.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 20110
Date:


L16:- Mana Ayukawa (JPN) / Emily Webley-Smith (GBR) CR474 (296+178) def Samira De Stefano (ITA) / Liriza Selishta (SUI) CR1908 (755+1153) 6-2 6-0

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1854
Date:

Katie served for the first and had set points but lost it in a tiebreak....

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39451
Date:

She served twice for it, having been *5-2 up. Overall 3 breaks each in the first set.

6-7(3) 2-1*

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10051
Date:

She looked better but not miles in front if that makes sense, so her being reeled back in wasn't a major surprise. Although she really should have got over the line at *5-4. She's had the better opportunities and now playing catch-up. But she's playing and moving better on the red stuff than I remember.

 

Broken from *30-0 though, 2-3*



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 12th of April 2023 03:40:22 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 17821
Date:

R1: SWAN, Katie (GBR) (4) 149 lost to PALICOVA, Barbora (CZE) 205 6-7(3) 4-6

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10051
Date:

She'll be rightly disappointed with that. Had the chances, but things to build on over the next few weeks.

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 699
Date:

Didn't Swan make the FQR at the French Open last year?

__________________
Come on brits :D


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 20110
Date:

L16:- Emily Appleton (GBR) / Julia Lohoff (GER) CR369 (189+180) [2] def Michaela Bayerlova (CZE) / Conny Perrin (SUI) CR435 (217+218) 3-6 7-6(5) 10-4

__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:

I'm concerned about how passive Katie is in so many of her matches. She was hitting the same paced ball, predictable serving pattern, rarely aggressive on return, no drop shots, slice, moon-balls, volleys, smashes or lobs.

How far does that get you ?

Despite the occasional sensational groundstroke winner from Palicova, the standard of play wasn't great; at times it was awful.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39451
Date:

wales1994 wrote:

Didn't Swan make the FQR at the French Open last year?


 No. She was beaten in QR1 by (q10) Viktoriya Tomova 6-3 6-2



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 492
Date:

kundalini wrote:

I'm concerned about how passive Katie is in so many of her matches. She was hitting the same paced ball, predictable serving pattern, rarely aggressive on return, no drop shots, slice, moon-balls, volleys, smashes or lobs.

How far does that get you ?

Despite the occasional sensational groundstroke winner from Palicova, the standard of play wasn't great; at times it was awful.


 I thought both were playing a similar game. Swan could have won the first set if her 1st serve had held up a bit more. There wasn't that much between them, and credit to her for putting much pressure on Palicova's service games. The Czech really hits the ball hard, and forces her opponent back, and doesn't miss much either. Palicova deserved the win, she was just that bit stronger and that made the difference.



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 492
Date:

indiana wrote:
wales1994 wrote:

Didn't Swan make the FQR at the French Open last year?


 No. She was beaten in QR1 by (q10) Viktoriya Tomova 6-3 6-2


 Lost to Kucova in Q3, Roland Garros 2019.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 20110
Date:

Doubles

QF:- Mana Ayukawa (JPN) / Emily Webley-Smith (GBR) CR474 (296+178) v Andreea Mitu (ROU) / Nadia Podoroska (ARG) CR729 (417+312)

QF:- Emily Appleton (GBR) / Julia Lohoff (GER) CR369 (189+180) [2] v Ilona Georgiana Ghioroaie (ROU) / Nika Radisic (SLO) CR493 (299+194)



-- Edited by the addict on Thursday 13th of April 2023 03:53:31 PM

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1370
Date:

A shame but I suppose clay isn't her best surface.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard