Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British women discussion section -> Week 4 - ITF W60 - Sunderland, Great Britain Hard
Post Info TOPIC: Week 4 - ITF W60 - Sunderland, Great Britain Hard
Peter too


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18080
Date:
Week 4 - ITF W60 - Sunderland, Great Britain Hard
Permalink  

Q1: AMOS, Abigail (GBR) 1147 =CH v BASZAK, Weronika (POL) (16) 792 (CH=766 2022) 

Q1: JOHN-BAPTISTE, Lauryn (GBR) 903 (CH=847 2022) v GIMBRERE, Jasmijn (NED) (10) 557 (CH=508 2022) 

Q1: SIMPSON, Francesca (GBR) WC UNR =CH {16yo JCH=1146} v MORVAYOVA, Viktoria (SVK) (3) 424 (CH=343 2022) 

Q1: WILSON, Emma (GBR) 803 =CH v STRESNAKOVA, Katarina (SVK) (13) 628 (CH=624 2022) 

They met at Roehampton last year with Emma winning 10-8 in the 3rd.

Q1: DAVIS, Francesca (GBR) WC UNR =CH {18yo JCH=UNR} v KANEV, Kathleen (GER) (4) 433 (CH=426 2022) 

Q1: MATOS SEQUEIRA FERNANDES, Jizel (GBR) WC UNR =CH v RINALDO PERSSON, Kajsa  (SWE) (5) 441 (CH=437 2022) 

Q1: GILLAN, Alice (GBR) (15) 752 (CH=685 2019) v HERING, Katharina (GER) 920 (CH=672 2016) 

They met in 2018 with Alice winning 6(3) & 0

Q1: RAWSON, Nadia (GBR) UNR =CH v EIKERI, Ulrikke (NOR) (6) 442 (CH=206 2018) 

Q1: CONWAY, Jasmine (GBR) (12) 602 (CH=598 2023) {18yo JCH=80} v MAIR, Laura (ITA) 886 (CH=827 2022) 

Q1: NEILSON-GATENBY, Talia (GBR) (9) 554 (CH=550 2022) {17yo JCH=158} v DALEY, Danielle (GBR) 1076 (CH=1057 2022) 

Q1: APPLETON, Emily (GBR) (8) 489 (CH=482 2022) v COPLEY, Sarah (GBR) WC UNR =CH {15yo JCH=1051} 

Q1: DUNNE, Katy (GBR) (14)  696 (CH=212 2018) v JONES, Francesca (GBR) WC UNR (CH=149 2022) 

 

The top seed was below Maia and Eden so they have probably been moved to the Main draw. Eliz, Freya and Sarah Beth are missing and probably got WCs.



-- Edited by Peter too on Sunday 22nd of January 2023 07:07:45 PM

__________________
telstar


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 518
Date:
Permalink  

What is the ruling on Protected Rankings please? Do players have to apply for them or are they automatic? Maia, for example, seems to have used hers on several occasions while Fran doesn't seem to have one.

__________________
Peter too


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18080
Date:
Permalink  

So who else is going to get a wild card? They usually give a WC to one of our juniors. There are not any high ranking ones listed in the acceptances, 16 year old Erin Pearce is probably the highest with a JCH=400.

__________________
telstar


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 518
Date:
Permalink  

Peter too wrote:

So who else is going to get a wild card? They usually give a WC to one of our juniors. There are not any high ranking ones listed in the acceptances, 16 year old Erin Pearce is probably the highest with a JCH=400.

 Probably, as at Loughborough, to a junior who didn't enter. Unfairly so, imho.



__________________
paulisi


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17383
Date:
Permalink  

telstar wrote:
What is the ruling on Protected Rankings please? Do players have to apply for them or are they automatic? Maia, for example, seems to have used hers on several occasions while Fran doesn't seem to have one.
 
 I think this came up with Katy Dunne's situation and as they are limited, the athlete uses them sparingly.


__________________
paulisi


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17383
Date:
Permalink  

Peter too wrote:

So who else is going to get a wild card? They usually give a WC to one of our juniors. There are not any high ranking ones listed in the acceptances, 16 year old Erin Pearce is probably the highest with a JCH=400.

 I'll take a punt on Sonay



__________________
Lambda


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2638
Date:
Permalink  

paulisi wrote:

telstar wrote:
What is the ruling on Protected Rankings please? Do players have to apply for them or are they automatic? Maia, for example, seems to have used hers on several occasions while Fran doesn't seem to have one.
 
 I think this came up with Katy Dunne's situation and as they are limited, the athlete uses them sparingly.


A player applies to have a protected ranking. Once she has a PR she can choose to enter a tournament with either her current ranking or her protected ranking. She can play in 8 tournaments with her protected ranking where she would not have got in otherwise if out for less than 52 weeks, or 12 if out for 52 weeks or longer.

Fran does have a PR as she had entered a 125K with it but has chosen not to use it in the ITFs she has entered. Although it is now more then 52 weeks since Fran last played a pro match, because she played the UKPL at the beginning of the month she will only have 8 PRs to use.

__________________
JonH comes home


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41514
Date:
Permalink  

Lambda wrote:
paulisi wrote:

 

telstar wrote:
What is the ruling on Protected Rankings please? Do players have to apply for them or are they automatic? Maia, for example, seems to have used hers on several occasions while Fran doesn't seem to have one.
 
 I think this came up with Katy Dunne's situation and as they are limited, the athlete uses them sparingly.

 


A player applies to have a protected ranking. Once she has a PR she can choose to enter a tournament with either her current ranking or her protected ranking. She can play in 8 tournaments with her protected ranking where she would not have got in otherwise if out for less than 52 weeks, or 12 if out for 52 weeks or longer.

Fran does have a PR as she had entered a 125K with it but has chosen not to use it in the ITFs she has entered. Although it is now more then 52 weeks since Fran last played a pro match, because she played the UKPL at the beginning of the month she will only have 8 PRs to use.

 Really, they use the UKPL for counting purposes even though it is effectively just an exhibition?! That seems draconian! 



__________________
Lambda


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2638
Date:
Permalink  

Peter too wrote:

So who else is going to get a wild card? They usually give a WC to one of our juniors. There are not any high ranking ones listed in the acceptances, 16 year old Erin Pearce is probably the highest with a JCH=400.



This is a 60K though, which has a different WC policy to 25Ks. In a 25, the policy is to give WCs to 21 and under, usually on a LTA development programme. In 60K and 100Ks the policy is to give WCs to those with the highest potential to reach the top 100 or by order of ranking has the best chance to succeed at this level.

With Burrage injured, there is really only Swan and Kartal that fit the criteria, with possibly Brogan as an outside possibility. If it were to go to a junior, the only one I can think of that could meet the criteria and not committed elsewhere is Xu, but I think she might be injured? Not seen her name for a while.

__________________
Lambda


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2638
Date:
Permalink  

JonH comes home wrote:

Lambda wrote:
paulisi wrote:

 

telstar wrote:
What is the ruling on Protected Rankings please? Do players have to apply for them or are they automatic? Maia, for example, seems to have used hers on several occasions while Fran doesn't seem to have one.
 
 I think this came up with Katy Dunne's situation and as they are limited, the athlete uses them sparingly.

 


A player applies to have a protected ranking. Once she has a PR she can choose to enter a tournament with either her current ranking or her protected ranking. She can play in 8 tournaments with her protected ranking where she would not have got in otherwise if out for less than 52 weeks, or 12 if out for 52 weeks or longer.

Fran does have a PR as she had entered a 125K with it but has chosen not to use it in the ITFs she has entered. Although it is now more then 52 weeks since Fran last played a pro match, because she played the UKPL at the beginning of the month she will only have 8 PRs to use.

 Really, they use the UKPL for counting purposes even though it is effectively just an exhibition?! That seems draconian! 



Even worse than that, you stop being out of competition as soon as you play any tennis event or any other organised sport. They can get an exemption to play an exhibition, but I'd imagine that would be more for exhibitions focused on entertainment than competition.

Tennis event defined as any WTA Tournament, Grand Slam, ITF (including World Tennis Tour and Billie Jean King Cup) event, Olympic or Olympic Qualification event, or Exhibition/Non-WTA Event, regardless of whether ranking points are awarded.

__________________
jb288


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1328
Date:
Permalink  

Annoyingly Emily App & Katy are in the same section here so only 1 can qualify.

Oh, and Fran of course. What a loaded section!



-- Edited by jb288 on Sunday 22nd of January 2023 08:44:13 AM

__________________
Coup Droit


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55280
Date:
Permalink  

ANY non-wta event?

A poxy regional team match in France would count?

__________________
wolf


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13874
Date:
Permalink  

I havent looked at the rules but theres no way thats the rule. Shes already had the time out, playing a non ranking event would not reduce her PR allocation.

__________________
the addict


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23284
Date:
Permalink  

Good summary of the rules by Lambda - I read them the same.

__________________
wolf


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13874
Date:
Permalink  

Whats the link to the rules?

__________________
1 2 3 … 9  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British women discussion section -> Week 4 - ITF W60 - Sunderland, Great Britain Hard
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard