As has been stated elsewhere in this thread, Matusevich and Parker are through to Wimbledon qualies.
(I know people usually use first names for these players but that's not my style somehow).
Congrats to both of them!
My question is whether the losing finalists (Broom and Paris) will be given wildcards too?
There are still 2 wildcards unaccounted for.
Same question for the women.
There's precedent for it - the LTA have certainly done it before.
My own feeling is that unlikely for Josh but Charlie may well have a chance - it's a little difficult to justify one semi-finalist and not the other but Charlie is 440 or whatever in the world - it's a reasonable call, whatever, and a lot more justifiable
There's precedent for it - the LTA have certainly done it before.
My own feeling is that unlikely for Josh but Charlie may well have a chance - it's a little difficult to justify one semi-finalist and not the other but Charlie is 440 or whatever in the world - it's a reasonable call, whatever, and a lot more justifiable
Given Dan Cox beat Charlie at Ilkley and had to miss the play offs, Id still like to think he also has a chance of one of those two spots. Although whether playing Eastbourne scuppers that?
As CD says there is indeed precedent for it - they have in the past given 0, 1 or 2 additional QWCs in these circumstances. However when they have given 1 additional WC it has always been, in my recollection, to the higher ranked of the two losing finalists in pre-qualification. We probably will not find out though until Sunday on past experience.
If Dan Cox lost at Eastbourne today can he also then go into the Wimbledon qualies field as a WC or would it preclude him as being two events in one week?