The Julian and Henry run right now, reminds me very much of the Jonny O'Mara/Scott Clayton run when they decided to focus more on doubles than singles.
Fair enough but I'm still going for Joe
It's the college thing, the graduation, going pro full time and then struggling in singles but doubles taking off - it seems to me that Jonny, for instance, spent far longer focused on singles
But as long as they all continue to do well, who cares.....
Thread a bit oversubscribed with doubles here no comments on Dan Cox match. Hes extremely unlucky not to be able to play the playoffs escpecially given the field that he would
be up against. Hopefully a QWC for Eastbourne to make up for missing out on Wimbledon.
I must confess, he hasnt done a great deal this year to meet the requirements for a qwc and a couple of round 16s doesnt add to it a great deal. However; agreed that it appears that he has been denied the opportunity to get into qualifying through other routes. This isnt new and maybe some consideration should go into this (maybe hold it at the weekend?). However, he seemingly performed well against a top 200 player today.
Thread a bit oversubscribed with doubles here no comments on Dan Cox match. Hes extremely unlucky not to be able to play the playoffs escpecially given the field that he would be up against. Hopefully a QWC for Eastbourne to make up for missing out on Wimbledon.
I watched a fair bit of the match (though watching another at the same time too)
I thought the score was fair - Dan acquitted himself very well, it was close, but the Bergs had just that little more power and placement when needed
And, yes, to the wildcard - we've been over the history with Sam Murray
I think your idea of a WC for Eastbourne is a good one, at the very least