Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 15 - ITF W25 - Oeiras, Portugal Clay


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18089
Date:
Week 15 - ITF W25 - Oeiras, Portugal Clay


Q1: SUTHERLAND, Andra (GBR) UNR =CH {17yo JCH=1940} v PINTO, Sofia (POR) UNR =CH {17yo JCH=723} 

 

Alicia Barnett was PFLWQD on 7th April.

 

Amanda Carreras will have been moved to the Main draw.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23319
Date:

Lissey and Liv might have gone to the W60 Switzerland where they could well be seeded

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2655
Date:

Why not just say she was a late withdrawal?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18089
Date:

Lambda wrote:

Why not just say she was a late withdrawal?


The ITF site lists some players as LWQD and some as PFLWQD (Post Freeze Late Withdrawal from Qualifying Draw.) 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40837
Date:

Peter too wrote:
Lambda wrote:

Why not just say she was a late withdrawal?


The ITF site lists some players as LWQD and some as PFLWQD (Post Freeze Late Withdrawal from Qualifying Draw.) 


 OK then, a "post freeze late withdrawal" if you prefer 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41825
Date:

indiana wrote:
Peter too wrote:
Lambda wrote:

Why not just say she was a late withdrawal?


The ITF site lists some players as LWQD and some as PFLWQD (Post Freeze Late Withdrawal from Qualifying Draw.) 


 OK then, a "post freeze late withdrawal" if you prefer 


 Its still blooming cold here so Id call it a mid freeze withdrawal to be fair 



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2655
Date:

But I don't see the need to specifically mention it was a post freeze withdrawal. Just saying x was a withdrawal on whatever date I think is sufficient here. The ITF site identifies them for transparency as post freeze withdrawals don't get replaced in the acceptance list.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55346
Date:

Do two letters really matter?

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1504
Date:

the addict wrote:

Lissey and Liv might have gone to the W60 Switzerland where they could well be seeded


 I think Lissey posted something about Switzerland earlier.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18089
Date:

Q1: SUTHERLAND, Andra (GBR) UNR lost to PINTO, Sofia (POR) UNR 1-6 3-6

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23319
Date:

Doubles

L16:- Francisca Jorge (POR) / Matilde Jorge (POR) CR745 (328+417) [4] v Milla Sequeira (SUI) / Andra Sutherland (GBR) UNR (1671+UNR)
Fourth ITF doubles match for these two as a pair. They have managed just three games in the previous three matches, and are up against it again.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18089
Date:

R1: CARRERAS, Amanda (GBR) 506 (CH=236 2017) v MARISTANY ZULETA DE REALES, Guiomar (ESP) 400 (CH=308 2019)
They met at Palmanova a month ago with Guiomar winning 1 & 4



-- Edited by Peter too on Wednesday 13th of April 2022 12:32:02 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23319
Date:

the addict wrote:

Doubles

L16:- Francisca Jorge (POR) / Matilde Jorge (POR) CR745 (328+417) [4] v Milla Sequeira (SUI) / Andra Sutherland (GBR) UNR (1671+UNR)
Fourth ITF doubles match for these two as a pair. They have managed just three games in the previous three matches, and are up against it again.


 A little better this week, but they lose 6-1 6-3



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18089
Date:

R1: CARRERAS, Amanda (GBR) 506 lost to MARISTANY ZULETA DE REALES, Guiomar (ESP) 400 4-6 6-7(1)

Amanda at least made an improvement on a month ago.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard