I'm not sure you'd get him for that. It requires clear intent, no? As opposed to recklessness, like some. And he would certainly argue that it was in anger but not with direct intent to actually cause alarm. Good argument the other way too, of course.
But common law assault is clear. There is no argument against at all.
I'm not sure you'd get him for that. It requires clear intent, no? As opposed to recklessness, like some. And he would certainly argue that it was in anger but not with direct intent to actually cause alarm. Good argument the other way too, of course.
But common law assault is clear. There is no argument against at all.
Possibly. It alarmed me though, and I think the umpire looked pretty harassed, if not threatened as he left the court extremely quickly! But I imagine the burden of proof is pretty high for a criminal conviction, so I expect you're right.
Anyway, he was lucky to get away with a suspended ban in any case in my view, probably coloured by the pictures of his ex-girlfriend!