Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 17 - ITF (W60) Charlottesville, USA Clay


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18096
Date:
Week 17 - ITF (W60) Charlottesville, USA Clay


Q1: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 3 250 lost to UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 5-7 3-6
Q1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 def YEPIFANOVA, Alexandra (USA) WC 1092 6-1 6-3
Q1: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 def PRICE, Gabriella (USA) WC 775 6-2 7-5

Q2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 (CH=82 2019) def UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 7-6(7) 6-1
Q2: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 (CH= 199 2020) lost to CHANG, Hanna (USA) 14 309 (CH=292 2020) 5-7 7-6(3) [6-10]

R1: DART, Harriet (GBR) 7 150 (CH=121 2019) v SEPEDE ROYG, Veronica (PAR) 184 (CH=73 2017)
R1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) Q 293 (CH=82 2019) v PAQUET, Chloe (FRA) 187 (CH=145 2019)

Katie has played Chloe twice before, winning both times.



-- Edited by Peter too on Wednesday 28th of April 2021 12:59:04 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40879
Date:

L16:- Erin Routliffe (NZL) / Aldila Sutjiadi (INA) CR 351 (152+199) beat (ALT) Emina Bektas (USA) / Tara Moore (GBR) CR 402 (201+201) by  6-2 6-4



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:

Peter too wrote:

Q1: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 3 250 lost to UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 5-7 3-6
Q1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 def YEPIFANOVA, Alexandra (USA) WC 1092 6-1 6-3
Q1: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 def PRICE, Gabriella (USA) WC 775 6-2 7-5

Q2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 (CH=82 2019) def UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 7-6(7) 6-1
Q2: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 (CH= 199 2020) lost to CHANG, Hanna (USA) 14 5-7 7-6(3) [6-10]

R1: DART, Harriet (GBR) 7 150 (CH=121 2019) v SEPEDE ROYG, Veronica (PAR) 184 (CH=73 2017)
R1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) Q 293 (CH=82 2019) v PAQUET, Chloe (FRA) 187 (CH=145 2019)

Katie has played Chloe twice before, winning both times.


 Really good to see Katie B back playing regularly and starting to look quite decent at times. She's probably under-ranked right now and has a decent chance in this match. Harriet's match might be quite tricky but again, at  times this year, she's looked quite good but needs more consistency. I do think she's at a pivotal point in her career. She will be 25 in July and, though of course far from old, in tennis terms she needs to be pushing on now as the next few years ought to see her at her prime.

A shame for Katie S. She's been held back by health issues and recent injury. The W60 level seems the right level for her right now.

I'm really not sure about Naiktha. She's obviously commited to the sport but she has to, in normal times, play an awful lot of tournaments to get 16 good ones.  She could almost do with a W40.5 tournament. She seems a bit too good at W25 level but not good enough at W60.



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

I'd like to see more of our women enter the doubles. They need more matches and Dan has shown them the way.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

emmsie69 wrote:

I'd like to see more of our women enter the doubles. They need more matches and Dan has shown them the way.


 Dan is quite healthy though - all the above women (am less sure about Bains) have had injuries and layoffs recently.

Edit - I don't disagree with your point though.



-- Edited by flamingowings on Wednesday 28th of April 2021 06:24:10 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42009
Date:

Would be welcome to see one of Harriet or Katie get a main draw win or two. Fran seems to be our only player doing it at this level or above this season. Not sure any of them will bother the French main draw organisers, maybe Fran will do something in qualies, but the clay is such good prep for grass that the Wimbledon run in really starts here.

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

flamingowings wrote:
emmsie69 wrote:

I'd like to see more of our women enter the doubles. They need more matches and Dan has shown them the way.


 Dan is quite healthy though - all the above women (am less sure about Bains) have had injuries and layoffs recently.

Edit - I don't disagree with your point though.



-- Edited by flamingowings on Wednesday 28th of April 2021 06:24:10 AM


 Maybe instead of going straight into Singles tournaments when returning from injury and losing 1st round, they would be better off just entering the doubles for a week or two to get some form. Unfortunately because they don't play doubles even when they are healthy, they don't have a good enough ranking to do that.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23350
Date:

emmsie69 wrote:
 Maybe instead of going straight into Singles tournaments when returning from injury and losing 1st round, they would be better off just entering the doubles for a week or two to get some form. Unfortunately because they don't play doubles even when they are healthy, they don't have a good enough ranking to do that.

 A valid point for our higher ranked players. Tara and Emina didn't make the doubles draw at WR201 each - they only got a match as alts. Tara is GB #6, and only Heather amongst our top singles players is ranked higher (Naomi, Emily W-S, Sam and Eden are the others). They could probably get in at most W25's if they drop down a level. But that would mean making a judgement call on whether it was worth travelling in the hope of making the cut



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

HarryGem wrote:
Peter too wrote:

Q1: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 3 250 lost to UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 5-7 3-6
Q1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 def YEPIFANOVA, Alexandra (USA) WC 1092 6-1 6-3
Q1: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 def PRICE, Gabriella (USA) WC 775 6-2 7-5

Q2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 10 292 (CH=82 2019) def UDVARDY, Panna (HUN) 326 7-6(7) 6-1
Q2: BAINS, Naiktha (GBR) 7 269 (CH= 199 2020) lost to CHANG, Hanna (USA) 14 5-7 7-6(3) [6-10]

R1: DART, Harriet (GBR) 7 150 (CH=121 2019) v SEPEDE ROYG, Veronica (PAR) 184 (CH=73 2017)
R1: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) Q 293 (CH=82 2019) v PAQUET, Chloe (FRA) 187 (CH=145 2019)

Katie has played Chloe twice before, winning both times.


 Really good to see Katie B back playing regularly and starting to look quite decent at times. She's probably under-ranked right now and has a decent chance in this match. Harriet's match might be quite tricky but again, at  times this year, she's looked quite good but needs more consistency. I do think she's at a pivotal point in her career. She will be 25 in July and, though of course far from old, in tennis terms she needs to be pushing on now as the next few years ought to see her at her prime.

A shame for Katie S. She's been held back by health issues and recent injury. The W60 level seems the right level for her right now.

I'm really not sure about Naiktha. She's obviously commited to the sport but she has to, in normal times, play an awful lot of tournaments to get 16 good ones.  She could almost do with a W40.5 tournament. She seems a bit too good at W25 level but not good enough at W60.


You think? 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23350
Date:

If you look at Naiktha's counters, there are only a few from W60 and above - most are from W25's. She has three WTA counters (two are for reaching QR2) and three from W60's (two QF and one R16). Not quite there for the W60's, but at the top of W25's with a win and two finals. So I agree with HarryGem

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

But if you actually look at her most recent W25 results:

www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/wplayer-classic.cgi

Perth - L32
Fujarah - L32
Orlando - L32
Boca Rotan - L32
Newport Beach - L16
Villa Maria - QF
Cordoba - L16

That's 7 events since her 2019 final and she's made the QF once. The success she has had at W25 has largely been due to weak fields - she didn't face one top 300 in her run to that Indian final against Emma in Dec 2019. She beat one top 300 player to win her title in Mildura in March 2019, and 3 of her 5 wins that week were against players north of 480 (W25's particularly in Europe and US can have a number of 100-199 type players). She is the betting underdog in the vast majority of her matches, including W25s, - she is absolutely not too good for W25 level IMO.



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

Ace Ventura wrote:

But if you actually look at her most recent W25 results:

www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/wplayer-classic.cgi

Perth - L32
Fujarah - L32
Orlando - L32
Boca Rotan - L32
Newport Beach - L16
Villa Maria - QF
Cordoba - L16

That's 7 events since her 2019 final and she's made the QF once. The success she has had at W25 has largely been due to weak fields - she didn't face one top 300 in her run to that Indian final against Emma in Dec 2019. She beat one top 300 player to win her title in Mildura in March 2019, and 3 of her 5 wins that week were against players north of 480 (W25's particularly in Europe and US can have a number of 100-199 type players). She is the betting underdog in the vast majority of her matches, including W25s, - she is absolutely not too good for W25 level IMO.


 I agree, 25k are about her level.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40879
Date:

You wouldn't find many better examples of 25K being their level than Naiktha, even when she was making some finals. 

Hopefully she can find better form again and at least start finding a bit more success there. Above that should logically just be only an occasional outing for the foreseeable. 

Hopefully for Katie B, on the other hand, this is another stepping stone back upwards, for a top 100 player in the past and that potential remains. 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Online
Posts: 1829
Date:

emmsie69 wrote:
flamingowings wrote:
emmsie69 wrote:

I'd like to see more of our women enter the doubles. They need more matches and Dan has shown them the way.


 Dan is quite healthy though - all the above women (am less sure about Bains) have had injuries and layoffs recently.

Edit - I don't disagree with your point though.



-- Edited by flamingowings on Wednesday 28th of April 2021 06:24:10 AM


 Maybe instead of going straight into Singles tournaments when returning from injury and losing 1st round, they would be better off just entering the doubles for a week or two to get some form. Unfortunately because they don't play doubles even when they are healthy, they don't have a good enough ranking to do that.


Post deleted

 



-- Edited by SuperT on Wednesday 28th of April 2021 04:44:31 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Katie's match should be starting very soon, but still one more match to start (and end) before Harriet's singles.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 511  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard