All the points look fairly competitive, if she turns up in Ecuador next week Id say this is more tactical/avoiding a little niggle. Or so I hope!
Why would she back out of a w60 semi to jack down to Ecuador for a w25?! Makes no logical sense in my eye. If injured , pull out. If not injured dont just throw this for a trip down to South America . Surely?!
Ecuador is hardcourt and she is supposed to be there for 2 weeks although the chances of her or Jodie getting through both weeks are practically non existent. Maybe she wants a bit of time practising, I hope thats the case anyway.
Yup, it seems a bit illogical (and I could of course be talking nonsense ) but theres very limited hard tournaments now before the grass kicks in and Katie has expressed a desire to get her ranking up quickly - those Ecuador tournaments look weak. Possibly an easier chance of points over two weeks than playing Claire Liu in good form...
When was the last time Katie B had to play 6 matches in a row? Surely that would take a lot out of anyone, especially if you havent had to do that kind of run for a while. I hope it isnt anything too serious and its just the increased match time that has caught up to her this week.
The look of that first set scoring is that it was more just what took place during that set. At best her matches suddenly catching up with her. If in fact injury related I do hope it is fairly minor.
Poor Katie - things were going so well for her this week. I was watching the snooker, so didn't catch the match, but there was no hint of injury on her previous match. Like others have said, she has played quite a few matches back to back - fingers crossed she gets back soon. I would still give her a wildcard for Wimbledon, because when fit, she is good enough to be on the top 100 - on the other hand, 'when fit' seems to still be the major issue for her.
Poor Katie - things were going so well for her this week. I was watching the snooker, so didn't catch the match, but there was no hint of injury on her previous match. Like others have said, she has played quite a few matches back to back - fingers crossed she gets back soon. I would still give her a wildcard for Wimbledon, because when fit, she is good enough to be on the top 100 - on the other hand, 'when fit' seems to still be the major issue for her.
No point in giving her a qWC if she can't play several matches in a row.
When was the last time Katie B had to play 6 matches in a row? Surely that would take a lot out of anyone, especially if you havent had to do that kind of run for a while. I hope it isnt anything too serious and its just the increased match time that has caught up to her this week.
She played back to back tournaments in Sharm end of October and guess what, in the 1st round of the 2nd week (6th match) she retired. She has had 3 retirements or W/O in her last 10 tournaments.
To clarify, I'm not having a go at the players, with all the women having issues with recurrent injuries I'm pointing the finger firmly at the LTA. Something is wrong with the training/physio for this to be such a constant issue with so many of our players.
When was the last time Katie B had to play 6 matches in a row? Surely that would take a lot out of anyone, especially if you havent had to do that kind of run for a while. I hope it isnt anything too serious and its just the increased match time that has caught up to her this week.
She played back to back tournaments in Sharm end of October and guess what, in the 1st round of the 2nd week (6th match) she retired. She has had 3 retirements or W/O in her last 10 tournaments.
To clarify, I'm not having a go at the players, with all the women having issues with recurrent injuries I'm pointing the finger firmly at the LTA. Something is wrong with the training/physio for this to be such a constant issue with so many of our players.
but...and i dont know... is it the lta or do the players at this level have their own coaches and look after their own fitness? Ie is the lta responsible for a Katie b or a harriet d, or a Katie s?
they may be, I dont know, but Id have thought there was some personal responsibility here as a pro?
When was the last time Katie B had to play 6 matches in a row? Surely that would take a lot out of anyone, especially if you havent had to do that kind of run for a while. I hope it isnt anything too serious and its just the increased match time that has caught up to her this week.
She played back to back tournaments in Sharm end of October and guess what, in the 1st round of the 2nd week (6th match) she retired. She has had 3 retirements or W/O in her last 10 tournaments.
To clarify, I'm not having a go at the players, with all the women having issues with recurrent injuries I'm pointing the finger firmly at the LTA. Something is wrong with the training/physio for this to be such a constant issue with so many of our players.
but...and i dont know... is it the lta or do the players at this level have their own coaches and look after their own fitness? Ie is the lta responsible for a Katie b or a harriet d, or a Katie s?
they may be, I dont know, but Id have thought there was some personal responsibility here as a pro?
I thin it was Heather that spoke about the work being done within the LTA re the female athletes menstruation cycles and the impact it has on the body, so I'm pretty confident that there is some overseeing done.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49426349
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/48243310
ETA Doesn't look like it was Heather maybe it's something the LTA aren't doing behind the scenes and should be. I know from running that there is a point in my cycle when my knees feel 'loose' not as stable as usual. I also had a lot of knee problems going through puberty that have resurfaced during menopause.
-- Edited by emmsie69 on Sunday 2nd of May 2021 07:28:07 AM
Liu ended up taking the title here, winning a very streaky match 4-1 RET in the decider, to take her biggest title to date. She fell from 137 in Jan 2019 to 400 odd in Sept of that year, so seems to be getting back on track.
When was the last time Katie B had to play 6 matches in a row? Surely that would take a lot out of anyone, especially if you havent had to do that kind of run for a while. I hope it isnt anything too serious and its just the increased match time that has caught up to her this week.
She played back to back tournaments in Sharm end of October and guess what, in the 1st round of the 2nd week (6th match) she retired. She has had 3 retirements or W/O in her last 10 tournaments.
To clarify, I'm not having a go at the players, with all the women having issues with recurrent injuries I'm pointing the finger firmly at the LTA. Something is wrong with the training/physio for this to be such a constant issue with so many of our players.
I agree though I do think players at the pro level should be able to maintain fitness etc on their own. However, I've long questioned the overall fitness, both physical and mental, of the British women players in general.
I'm not sure how much of a role the LTA has in it at an individual level if any. Perhaps someone better informed than I am would be able to say.
I have to question though why on earth Katie B is planning on playing another tournament just a few days after withdrawing from another. Is this the best way to manage her injuries and fitness? Obviously you would hope she is being properly advised and monitored but of the injury was bad enough to withdraw how quickly will it heal properly playing again so soon?
Poor Katie - things were going so well for her this week. I was watching the snooker, so didn't catch the match, but there was no hint of injury on her previous match. Like others have said, she has played quite a few matches back to back - fingers crossed she gets back soon. I would still give her a wildcard for Wimbledon, because when fit, she is good enough to be on the top 100 - on the other hand, 'when fit' seems to still be the major issue for her.
No point in giving her a qWC if she can't play several matches in a row.
Completely agree. Utter waste of a wildcard and not fair to other players who may benefit. Right now I wouldn't give a single Wimbledon wildcard to any British woman player. They need to start earning them a bit more. They have chances in the next few weeks to change this.
Poor Katie - things were going so well for her this week. I was watching the snooker, so didn't catch the match, but there was no hint of injury on her previous match. Like others have said, she has played quite a few matches back to back - fingers crossed she gets back soon. I would still give her a wildcard for Wimbledon, because when fit, she is good enough to be on the top 100 - on the other hand, 'when fit' seems to still be the major issue for her.
No point in giving her a qWC if she can't play several matches in a row.
Completely agree. Utter waste of a wildcard and not fair to other players who may benefit. Right now I wouldn't give a single Wimbledon wildcard to any British woman player. They need to start earning them a bit more. They have chances in the next few weeks to change this.
HarryGem wrote: I have to question though why on earth Katie B is planning on playing another tournament just a few days after withdrawing from another. Is this the best way to manage her injuries and fitness? Obviously you would hope she is being properly advised and monitored but of the injury was bad enough to withdraw how quickly will it heal properly playing again so soon?
She may have pulled out. We won't know until the draw comes out.