Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 41 - ITF (W15) Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:
Week 41 - ITF (W15) Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt Hard


R1: CHRISTIE, Freya (GBR) 654/963 lost to KULAMBAYEVA, Zhibek (KAZ) 658/142 3-6 1-6
R1: LINDH, Emilie (GBR) LL 729/42 def SCHOLSEN, Helene (BEL) Q 874/1377 7-5 6-4

R2: LINDH, Emilie (GBR) LL 729/42 (CH=643/35 2019) v SAMIR, Sandra (EGY) 2 351/10 (CH=349/2 2020)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Emilie, as lucky loser, has won the first set, 7-5


 And the second 6-4  smile



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6850
Date:

Well done Emilie biggrin



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

Sandra Samir was runner-up last week, so a tough match tomorrow.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6850
Date:

the addict wrote:

Sandra Samir was runner-up last week, so a tough match tomorrow.


 WR 351 and on a roll.

Good luck Emilie smilesmilesmile



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

Emilie retired after just one game - she dropped serve in a game that lasted 12 points.

Joanna Garland beat the top seed, Chanel Simmonds 7-5 6-2

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1830
Date:

I think it's dreadful that she retired in qualies, accepted a lucky loser spot and then retired again after only one game thereby depriving someone else of the opportunity to compete. It's about time the ITF changed the rules to prevent this happening. Once someone retires from a match they shouldn't be allowed to take any further part in that competition. At least that's my opinion!

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

SuperT wrote:

I think it's dreadful that she retired in qualies, accepted a lucky loser spot and then retired again after only one game thereby depriving someone else of the opportunity to compete. It's about time the ITF changed the rules to prevent this happening. Once someone retires from a match they shouldn't be allowed to take any further part in that competition. At least that's my opinion!


 I am in total agreement. I think there would've likely been an earlier comment made about getting in as LL after retiring if she hasn't been GB.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55408
Date:

SuperT wrote:

I think it's dreadful that she retired in qualies, accepted a lucky loser spot and then retired again after only one game thereby depriving someone else of the opportunity to compete. It's about time the ITF changed the rules to prevent this happening. Once someone retires from a match they shouldn't be allowed to take any further part in that competition. At least that's my opinion!


 I tend to agree.

Although the narrative you give does leave out the fact she played one match in between the two retirements, which she did win. 

i.e. it implies she accepted the LL spot and then retired again in the next match. Which is not so.

And, anyway, I have no complaints at all with Emilie for accepting it - she was eligible, she played and won her next match.

But - yes - overall, for the ITF rule committee, if you retire in the FQR, I don't think you should be eligible for a LL spot. 

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

I agree in general that if you retire from an event, that should be it for you, even if just a cold / bad tummy etc, that you can easily recover from, but at the moment you are allowed back in, and at least she did get a win yesterday, a good one at that, so must have been feeling OK to compeye, so it doesn't look as bad as coming back and immediately retiring which would have been 100% a waste of a space in the draw.

I hope they do change the rules, but I don't really think Emilie has done anything wrong in this situation because of the rules and that win.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Kind of said similar to CD there.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

Totally agree with CD and Ace

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1830
Date:

I had missed the fact that this was a second round match and she played and won yesterday, which I agree sort of mitigates the situation in this instance. Also it's a fair point that whilst the rules allow it I might be unfair criticising Emilie for doing what's allowed (although there were no shortage of critics when Katie B used the rules to her advantage at the FO a couple of years ago) However I stick to my point that the rules should be changed to prevent someone retiring and coming back in the same event. This would still allow someone who retired in singles FQ with just a minor ailment to play doubles if they recovered quickly.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

Looks like Freya and Emily Arb are in a hurry. 6-0 *2-0 in 29 minutes in their QF

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55408
Date:

the addict wrote:

Looks like Freya and Emily Arb are in a hurry. 6-0 *2-0 in 29 minutes in their QF


 But nice of them to let their opponents win one game smile

0 & 1, done and dusted



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard