Couldn't see any standings. So was having a look. After points(sets) i'm not sure what differentiator is. I've gone for Games difference in the first two sets.
Couldn't see any standings. So was having a look. After points(sets) i'm not sure what differentiator is. I've gone for Games difference in the first two sets.
Pool A
Sets
Game difference
Fery
4
9
Whitehouse
4
7
Storrie
2
-1
Gray
2
-10
Canter
1
2
Cash
0
-7
Pool B
Sets
Game Difference
Johnson
4
13
Harris
4
7
Willis
2
3
Glasspool
2
-1
Hands
1
-10
Martin
0
-12
Thanks Madadman - there was an instagram page that had the points system on it; but I cant find that! But on the first page of this thread, Tramlines summarised them and players get 3 points for a 2-0 win, 2 for a 2-1 win, 1 and 0 accordingly...
Presumably it wont change the table above much, and I can only see Day 1 results on the website, but points may be slightly different to the above based on 3 points for a straightsets win...
Couldn't see any standings. So was having a look. After points(sets) i'm not sure what differentiator is. I've gone for Games difference in the first two sets.
Pool A
Sets
Game difference
Fery
4
9
Whitehouse
4
7
Storrie
2
-1
Gray
2
-10
Canter
1
2
Cash
0
-7
Pool B
Sets
Game Difference
Johnson
4
13
Harris
4
7
Willis
2
3
Glasspool
2
-1
Hands
1
-10
Martin
0
-12
Thanks Madadman - there was an instagram page that had the points system on it; but I cant find that! But on the first page of this thread, Tramlines summarised them and players get 3 points for a 2-0 win, 2 for a 2-1 win, 1 and 0 accordingly...
Presumably it wont change the table above much, and I can only see Day 1 results on the website, but points may be slightly different to the above based on 3 points for a straightsets win...
Makes sense. Think I misread them then. Have applied that system to some tables.
Couldn't see any standings. So was having a look. After points(sets) i'm not sure what differentiator is. I've gone for Games difference in the first two sets.
Pool A
Sets
Game difference
Fery
4
9
Whitehouse
4
7
Storrie
2
-1
Gray
2
-10
Canter
1
2
Cash
0
-7
Pool B
Sets
Game Difference
Johnson
4
13
Harris
4
7
Willis
2
3
Glasspool
2
-1
Hands
1
-10
Martin
0
-12
Thanks Madadman - there was an instagram page that had the points system on it; but I cant find that! But on the first page of this thread, Tramlines summarised them and players get 3 points for a 2-0 win, 2 for a 2-1 win, 1 and 0 accordingly...
Presumably it wont change the table above much, and I can only see Day 1 results on the website, but points may be slightly different to the above based on 3 points for a straightsets win...
Makes sense. Think I misread them then. Have applied that system to some tables.
Updated tables. Top two in both groups play each other today.
w
l
sf
sa
sd
gf
ga
gd
pts
Arthur Fery
3
0
6
0
6
37
21
16
9
Mark Whitehouse
3
0
6
0
6
38
24
14
9
Julian Cash
1
2
2
4
-2
32
31
1
3
Ryan Storrie
1
2
2
4
-2
26
35
-9
3
Jonathan Gray
1
2
2
5
-3
19
36
-17
2
Alexis Canter
0
3
1
6
-5
28
33
-5
1
w
l
sf
sa
sd
gf
ga
gd
pts
Luke Johnson
3
0
6
0
6
37
18
19
9
Billy Harris
3
0
6
1
5
39
26
13
8
Lloyd Glasspool
2
1
4
2
2
27
29
-2
5
Marcus Willis
1
2
2
4
-2
29
32
-3
3
Tom Hands
0
3
2
6
-4
25
34
-9
2
Toby Martin
0
3
0
6
-6
18
36
-18
0
Top 2 playing should make it interesting - in Box A (as they seem to be calling it!) though Fery and Whitehouse have a buffer so should both be favourites to progress to the semis. If Lloyd wins today, then the other group could be interesting, but the winner of Luke and Billy should progress to the semis one would expect?
I've not really been following the men's, so thanks for the tables to provide a snapshot. Aye, Fery and Whitehouse pretty much there already, if their match goes to a MTB, both will qualify for the semis as 10 points will be insurmountable, and there's little margin of error for the chasing pack. One of Fery and Whitehouse will have to lose both matches 0-2, and either Julian or Ryan will have to win their 2 matches 2-0 to level on 9 points, and even then, it would come down to H2H, which I'm not sure who that favours without further checking.