RR1/1: Luke Johnson WR 681 defeated David Fox WR 988 by 2 & 4 in an hour & 20 minutes
RR1/2: Julian Cash WR 1195 defeated Alexis Canter WR 1017 by 6-2 6-7(5) [10-5] in an hour & 58 minutes
RR1/3: Joshua Paris WR 1040 (CH = 769 last August) defeated Alexander Jhun WR 1420 (CH = 1034 in February 2016) by 7-5 4-6 [10-7] in two hours & 11 minutes
RR1/4: Henry Patten WR 1325 (CH = 1302 in February) defeated Toby Martin WR 869 (CH = 641 in June 2015) by 3 & 4 in an hour & 11 minutes
RR1/1: Luke Johnson WR 681 defeated David Fox WR 988 by 2 & 4 in an hour & 20 minutes
RR1/2: Julian Cash WR 1195 defeated Alexis Canter WR 1017 by 6-2 6-7(5) [10-5] in an hour & 58 minutes
RR1/3: Joshua Paris WR 1040 (CH = 769 last August) defeated Alexander Jhun WR 1420 (CH = 1034 in February 2016) by 7-5 4-6 [10-7] in two hours & 11 minutes
RR1/4: Henry Patten WR 1325 (CH = 1302 in February) defeated Toby Martin WR 869 (CH = 641 in June 2015) by 3 & 4 in an hour & 11 minutes
RR1/5: Billy Harris WR 790 (CH = 609 in October 2018) defeated Max Basing WR 1466 (CH = 1437 in February) by 7-6(3) 6-2
RR1/1: Luke Johnson WR 681 defeated David Fox WR 988 by 2 & 4 in an hour & 20 minutes
RR1/2: Julian Cash WR 1195 defeated Alexis Canter WR 1017 by 6-2 6-7(5) [10-5] in an hour & 58 minutes
RR1/3: Joshua Paris WR 1040 (CH = 769 last August) defeated Alexander Jhun WR 1420 (CH = 1034 in February 2016) by 7-5 4-6 [10-7] in two hours & 11 minutes
RR1/4: Henry Patten WR 1325 (CH = 1302 in February) defeated Toby Martin WR 869 (CH = 641 in June 2015) by 3 & 4 in an hour & 11 minutes
RR1/5: Billy Harris WR 790 (CH = 609 in October 2018) defeated Max Basing WR 1466 (CH = 1437 in February) by 7-6(3) 6-2
RR1/6: Mark Whitehouse WR 603 (CH = 530 last August) defeated Sean Hodkin WR 1211 (CH = 1182 in June 2018) by 7-6(1) 6-1
One thing I like about the event here is how the points structure works in the group format. I like the idea of giving players 3,2 or 1 points in the group - if applied to the ATP Finals, I think it could work well. It is actually more intuitive and simpler than the current ATP structure which requires all sorts of countback processes. I am sure there will still be ties, but clearly that would be done on games.
Obviously the ATP finals would still need to be full 3 set matches, I would say, as opposed to MTB, but the idea of someone winning 2-0 and getting 3 points works well for me. If they played 5 sets, this could be even better, with a 3-0 win being 5-0, 3-1 becoming 4-1 on points and 3-2 staying as 3-2. This of course is very much like the squash club leagues and ladders many of us would have played at some time in our lives!