This is so close to me, but much as I would like to vote for Fred, it is Borg's 5 back to back French/Wimbledon titles that does it for me, in a career that finished at 26. If Borg had played 5 more years, 11 slams could have been 16-21 perhaps and we would rank him as the greatest without question.
It's amazing and makes me proud to think 3 of the best 24 men and women players ever are Brits! Fab!
You were apparently very unconvinced by Andy's presence though
It was said with a heavy sense of scepticism I'm afraid!
It shouldn't be.
If you reversed Murray and Djokovic's records, personally I would still have both to go through.
To be honest, andy stacks up and would be in my top 20npf all time, I feel though we dont give enough credit to those stars of yesteryear, although realise we differ on that!
Yes, it is my view of how I judge current players vs past players and the credit I think appropriate where I clearly diverge from some folk and there is an argument to be had.
Nout to do with British biased. eg. I picked Borg in this play-off.
-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 26th of May 2020 08:21:17 PM
Yes, it is my view of how I judge current players vs past players and the credit I think appropriate where I clearly diverge from some folk and there is an argument to be had.
Nout to do with British biased.
Nope, I dont think you would be and you voted for Borg against Perry here, which proves the point. But I find it hard to believe 11 out of 15 people genuinely think Perry was the greater of him and Borg, I really do, and the evidence of that and Angela Mortimer going through to the semis makes me think there is some correlation, of which being British is the only one I can currently point to!
And it may be fair enough!
Although I do agree Perry is also a top 20 player of all time and , in fact, ahead of Andy. Just not ahead of Borg!