That's a fair draw for Harriet. Won't be easy, but more favourable than most of the other possibilities I'd have thought. If I was listing my preference, it would go something like
On a side note, after a largely drab R1 schedule outside of a few select matches like Vekic-Sharapova, and Gauff-Venus, (that's generally speaking, without my British hat on, which would naturally be of interest whoever they faced), the qualifier placements have thrown in some additional interesting ties. Yastremska vs (a seemingly rejuvenated) Juvan (excuse the pun), could be a good one. Ostapenko-Samsonova another.
-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Saturday 18th of January 2020 12:33:08 PM
And only 6 votes so far, so would be good to have some more!
The inclusion of doubles, as opposed to keeping them seperate, may put a few off, because it can lead to just plucking a random number out of the air for those with little interest.
And only 6 votes so far, so would be good to have some more!
The inclusion of doubles, as opposed to keeping them seperate, may put a few off, because it can lead to just plucking a random number out of the air for those with little interest.
To be honest I've done those polls every slam for a couple of years and always included doubles , we usually get around 14 or so people take part usually
And only 6 votes so far, so would be good to have some more!
The inclusion of doubles, as opposed to keeping them seperate, may put a few off, because it can lead to just plucking a random number out of the air for those with little interest.
And only 6 votes so far, so would be good to have some more!
The inclusion of doubles, as opposed to keeping them seperate, may put a few off, because it can lead to just plucking a random number out of the air for those with little interest.
To be honest I've done those polls every slam for a couple of years and always included doubles , we usually get around 14 or so people take part usually
Yep, I know you have, and hopefully you get a few more taking part before the cut off as you put a fair bit of effort and enthusiasm into it, and doubles are reasonably popular on this forum in general, but I still think a few extra may participate if the singles were kept seperate. That said, a lot do appreciate what you do, so keep it up.
And only 6 votes so far, so would be good to have some more!
The inclusion of doubles, as opposed to keeping them seperate, may put a few off, because it can lead to just plucking a random number out of the air for those with little interest.
To be honest I've done those polls every slam for a couple of years and always included doubles , we usually get around 14 or so people take part usually
Although I used to exclude mixed and then added it due to various aspects of popular demand !
Not too sure how they make Jo favourite against Jabeur. On their last meeting at Eastbourne Jo only won 5 games. The thing you can say about that was that the match was on court 1 and not the Centre Court and Jo might have been saving her energy for Wimbledon. However Jabeur was in good form this week.
-- Edited by JonH comes home on Friday 17th of January 2020 03:26:19 PM
Just for interest (or not....), and with thanks to zootennis:
Five former #ausopen junior champions in women's singles draws this year:
Strycova(02, 03) Pavlyuchenkova(06, 07) Rus(08) Ka Pliskova(10) Townsend(12)
Interesting to see which former junior champs are in the main draw even going back 18 years. Shows how durable Strycova is. However there are no players from 2013 onwards which begs the question what has gone wrong? I know the player who beat Katie Swan in 2015 has never made it on the main tour.
I find junior tennis very one dimensional and they don't need to be natural athletes to progress, whereas once you hit the seniors you really need to be able to move well to push on.
Just for interest (or not....), and with thanks to zootennis:
Five former #ausopen junior champions in women's singles draws this year:
Strycova(02, 03) Pavlyuchenkova(06, 07) Rus(08) Ka Pliskova(10) Townsend(12)
Interesting to see which former junior champs are in the main draw even going back 18 years. Shows how durable Strycova is. However there are no players from 2013 onwards which begs the question what has gone wrong? I know the player who beat Katie Swan in 2015 has never made it on the main tour.
2013 - Ana Konjuh - elbow injury
2014 - Elizaveta Kulichkova - last played 2017 US Open qualifying so I imagine injured but not sure. Career high ranking 87. Wikipedia says retired. Tennisforum says now a coach.
2015 - Tereza Mihalikova - currently ranked 528, career high 349
2016 - Vera Lapko - currently ranked 360. Career high 60. Not played since Wimbledon. Knee injury and health issues (low immune system) mentioned in an article.
2017 - Marta Kostyuk - currently ranked 149. Career high 116
2018 - En-Shuo Liang - currently ranked 235. Career high 150
2019 - Clara Tauson - currently ranked 271. Career high 265
So I guess the answer is a combination of serious injury (3), perhaps not that amazing a player (1) and too early to expect much at WTA level (3).
Everyone of those from 2013-2018 received a QWC the next year, bar Kulichkova, who was already in the Q draw. No Tauson this year, so not sure if she's injured, or if they have stopped doing that. Diane Parry did get a QWC announced ages ago, so perhaps they have another arrangement with France to swap QWCs now, along with the reciprocal MDWC?