Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 3-4 - Australian Open, Women's Main Draw - Melbourne, Australia - Hard


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Weeks 3-4 - Australian Open, Women's Main Draw - Melbourne, Australia - Hard


There are some very interesting thoughts on all of this on here.

I can't just find the link but I'm pretty sure the ITF did some research a couple of years ago which found that only the top 300 women could actually make a living/break even out of the game itself. I think there is a false impression given by some of the players themselves when they post on instagram pictures of themselves in glamorous locations etc etc. From these it is easy to assume a cushy extremely well off life style which for a large number of players outside the top 300 or so is obviously not the case.

On reflection on the current tournament whilst it is true that certain players did better than perhaps expected I do think it is hard to qualify the overall results of the British women as a success. Out of 3 qualifiers Harriet did well but Sam and Naiktha didn't get close. Though Heather and Harriet did well to win one match each they both didn't get close to troubling their higher ranked opponents in the next round (admittedly Harriet was up against a top top player). Also the lack of any representation in the doubles was also disappointing.

I understand and appreciate the arguments on here about the past and how we've not since the 1970s really done much in women's tennis. However, I'm not especially interested in the past in respect of where we are now or can be in the future. There are many on here who know far far more than I do about the structure of the game in the UK but I wonder if a more holistic approach is required. We have a group of young women who seem to suffer from continuous injuries and pshychological struggles. I question whether we could do more centrally to help with all these issues.
Also do we look at how other nations do things? Yes tennis, like all sports, is cyclical, but for the last 40 years we seem to have achieved cycles of mediocrity. With opportunities for young women growing in all sports it will be harder for tennis in the future unless something is done to break away from the image that it is a sport for mainly upper/middle class white women.
Surely a traget of 5 players firmly and continuosly placed in the top 100 isn't too much to strive for?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55410
Date:

I think your numbers for breaking even are high:

Old stats, 2013:

"According to the International Tennis Federation, which runs and operates futures tournaments, the Davis Cup, the Fed Cup and tennis at the Olympics, among other events, 336 men and 251 women break even in professional tennis each year. The ITF conducted a study in 201415 that looked at prize money between 2001 and 2013 for all pro players the 9,000 men and 5,000 women who played at least one pro tournament. The results didnt factor in the cost of a coach."

From 2019 ITF article:

"A survey carried out by ITF chiefs concluded that reform was drastically required in the lower echelons of the sport. The survey is said to have been the biggest in the ITFs history with around 55,000 people consulted including players, coaches, administrators and player support team members. Concerns were raised regarding prize money, with just 336 men and 253 women able to break even before even factoring in coaching costs"

So, it's only 250 women - but that's BEFORE coaching costs.





__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

Exactly, thats 250 women in the world breaking even compared to 60,000+ in the UK alone making £150,000+ a year with no worry about getting iinjured and losing income, being able to go out partying every weekend if they want with friends rather than sit in a hotel on their own, not being completely stuffed if they find themselves pregnant (still some work to go on that granted)  You have to have some serious talent and self belief to go the route of professional tennis player for any length of time. I don't necessarily think UK are doing anything wrong, there are just so many other routes to take these days for women born in the UK, following a dream to be a professional tennis player is the equivalent of buying a lottery ticket.  The opportunity to get a scholarship for Tennis in the US is probably the only thing keeping a lot of girls playing past 16 now that University is so expensive in the UK.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

QF line up:

[1] Ash Barty vs. [7] Petra Kvitova
[14] Sofia Kenin vs. Ons Jabeur
[4] Simona Halep vs. [28] Anett Kontaveit
Garbine Muguruza vs. [30] Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova

The Garbi/Pavs match may be interesting as Pavs is now with Garbi's ex coach SumK. Conchita is obviously doing something for Garbine's game. Tough call for Ash vs Petra as I love them both and wish that was the final. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42027
Date:

flamingowings wrote:

QF line up:

[1] Ash Barty vs. [7] Petra Kvitova
[14] Sofia Kenin vs. Ons Jabeur
[4] Simona Halep vs. [28] Anett Kontaveit
Garbine Muguruza vs. [30] Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova

The Garbi/Pavs match may be interesting as Pavs is now with Garbi's ex coach SumK. Conchita is obviously doing something for Garbine's game. Tough call for Ash vs Petra as I love them both and wish that was the final. 


 Tennis Abstracts latest forecasts

2020 Australian Open Womens' Draw Forecast

Player     SF  F  W
(1)Ashleigh Barty (AUS)     67.5%  51.1%  35.7%
(7)Petra Kvitova (CZE)     32.5%  19.8%  10.6%
(14)Sofia Kenin (USA)     76.5%  25.9%  12.7%
Ons Jabeur (TUN)     23.5%  3.3%  0.8%
(28)Anett Kontaveit (EST)     20.3%  7.8%  1.7%
(4)Simona Halep (ROU)     79.7%  56.8%  28.1%
Garbine Muguruza (ESP)     54.0%  20.0%  6.2%
(30)Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (RUS)     46.0%  15.4%  4.3%


__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1858
Date:

flamingowings wrote:

QF line up:

[1] Ash Barty vs. [7] Petra Kvitova
[14] Sofia Kenin vs. Ons Jabeur
[4] Simona Halep vs. [28] Anett Kontaveit
Garbine Muguruza vs. [30] Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova

The Garbi/Pavs match may be interesting as Pavs is now with Garbi's ex coach SumK. Conchita is obviously doing something for Garbine's game. Tough call for Ash vs Petra as I love them both and wish that was the final. 


 I don't suppose it will happen but I would love Jabeur to win or at least reach the  final. It would be a first for North African tennis. Not for anyone living in the present but South Africa did  have a Wimbledon singles  finalist in 1960. (even I don't remember that)



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

ROSAMUND wrote:
flamingowings wrote:

QF line up:

[1] Ash Barty vs. [7] Petra Kvitova
[14] Sofia Kenin vs. Ons Jabeur
[4] Simona Halep vs. [28] Anett Kontaveit
Garbine Muguruza vs. [30] Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova

The Garbi/Pavs match may be interesting as Pavs is now with Garbi's ex coach SumK. Conchita is obviously doing something for Garbine's game. Tough call for Ash vs Petra as I love them both and wish that was the final. 


 I don't suppose it will happen but I would love Jabeur to win or at least reach the  final. It would be a first for North African tennis. Not for anyone living in the present but South Africa did  have a Wimbledon singles  finalist in 1960. (even I don't remember that)


 That truly would be special. Also worthy noting that no player left has won AO before so it's a new winner and 4 players haven't won a slam or reached a final (Pavs, Kenin, Jabeur, Kontavett)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55410
Date:

Also rooting for Jabeur. I saw her play several times as a junior (in France).

Would be great to have new faces at the top level in the sport.

For those who like to follow the junior-adult correlation, it's true that they're hardly any ex-winners of the Aussie Open Juniors in the Aussie Open adults, but the ranking shows a clear follow-through:

@Parsa_Nemati

ITF juniors career-high rankings of the 8 #AusOpen quarterfinalists:

1 - Simona Halep/Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
2 - Ash Barty/Sonya Kenin
4 - Ons Jabeur/Anett Kontaveit
27 - Petra Kvitová
302 - Garbiñe Muguruza

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42027
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Also rooting for Jabeur. I saw her play several times as a junior (in France).

Would be great to have new faces at the top level in the sport.

For those who like to follow the junior-adult correlation, it's true that they're hardly any ex-winners of the Aussie Open Juniors in the Aussie Open adults, but the ranking shows a clear follow-through:

@Parsa_Nemati

ITF juniors career-high rankings of the 8 #AusOpen quarterfinalists:

1 - Simona Halep/Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
2 - Ash Barty/Sonya Kenin
4 - Ons Jabeur/Anett Kontaveit
27 - Petra Kvitová
302 - Garbiñe Muguruza


 It's pretty clear Muguruza will win this event now, CD 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1858
Date:

 Ons Jabeur's best junior Slam was the French. She was runner up to Svitolina in 2010 and won it in 2011 beating Puig in the final.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Also rooting for Jabeur. I saw her play several times as a junior (in France).

Would be great to have new faces at the top level in the sport.

For those who like to follow the junior-adult correlation, it's true that they're hardly any ex-winners of the Aussie Open Juniors in the Aussie Open adults, but the ranking shows a clear follow-through:

@Parsa_Nemati

ITF juniors career-high rankings of the 8 #AusOpen quarterfinalists:

1 - Simona Halep/Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
2 - Ash Barty/Sonya Kenin
4 - Ons Jabeur/Anett Kontaveit
27 - Petra Kvitová
302 - Garbiñe Muguruza


 New faces at the top of the WTA is not something we need to worry about!! biggrin The ATP OTOH...



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55410
Date:

I think I meant 'new sort of faces' i.e. wouldn't it be great to have a Muslim, North African female player in the semis?

But, yes, otherwise, there's certainly a pretty good merry-go-round with the women at the moment......although I quite like that

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1858
Date:

Kenin beat Jabeur so won't be having a North African finalist. However it's back to the traditional Australia v. USA with Barty playing Kenin in the semi final.. 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1858
Date:

Muguruza has reached the semi finals so maintains  the record of the Australian ladies singles having an unseeded semi finalist every year from 2015 onwards. There may be a new champion but the semi finals  do include 3 Grand Slam singles winners including the current French and Wimbledon Champions.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40883
Date:

If it's a Barty vs Halep final then it will be the 3rd year in a row that the Aus Open final has featured the live #1 and #2.

The last 2 years ( 2019 - Osaka beating Kvitova and 2018 - Wozniacki beating Halep ) the final has determined the post Aus Open WR 1 and 2 order. This time the order is already certain to be WR 1 Barty and WR 2 Halep.

And with Serena beating Venus in the 2017 final, if Barty wins the title this year it will be the 4th year in a row that the champion has left Melbourne as WR 1.

__________________
«First  <  117 18 19 20 21 22  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard