Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 2 - Challenger 80 ($54,160+H) - Bendigo, VIC, Australia (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39448
Date:
Week 2 - Challenger 80 ($54,160+H) - Bendigo, VIC, Australia (hard) - doubles


That's basically what we have just now, Jon. Just have doubles only threads for some of the bjgger events, mainly Slams. Seems to work pretty well. 


There was no consensus for wider use of separate threads.



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 14th of January 2020 04:27:24 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 20105
Date:

Anyway, this thread is both singles AND doubles, so it should have neither in the title, as Indy said

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19012
Date:

the addict wrote:

Anyway, this thread is both singles AND doubles, so it should have neither in the title, as Indy said


Agreed



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 35611
Date:

indiana wrote:

That's basically what we have just now, Jon. Just have doubles only threads for some of the bjgger events, mainly Slams. Seems to work pretty well. 


There was no consensus for wider use of separate threads.



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 14th of January 2020 04:27:24 PM


 in which case we violently agree!!! 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

Agree that title threads shouldn't be changed unless it's typo issue of some sort. For one thing, why make extra work for yourself?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52896
Date:
Week 2 - Challenger 80 ($54,160+H) - Bendigo, VIC, Australia (hard)


indiana wrote:

I thought that we agreed to not change thread titles to "doubles" when there was just GB doubles players remaining but there had been GB singles players.

Whatever, I don't think we should change such titles. These threads are records as well as live threads for the week.

And Jaggy might be desperate to see how James Ward's singles has gone but leave this "doubles" thread well alone   


I have no recollection of it, if we did.  I just went ahead & did it - & editing the subject line by adding "- doubles" is hardly extra work!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52896
Date:

L16:  Nikola Cacic & Denys Molchanov (SRB/UKR) CR 163 (73+90) defeated Brydan Klein & Scott Puodziunas (AUS) CR 438 (267+171) by 7-6(4) 6-4

Not a kind draw!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 35611
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61) defeated André Göransson & Sem Verbeek (SWE/NED) CR 255 (114+141) by 2-6 7-5 [10-2]

*****

QF:  (WC) Maverick Banes & Blake Ellis (AUS/AUS) CR 695 (462+233) vs (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61)


 Phew, would be good for Jonny and Arevalo to get some game time this week, so this is welcome, as they play in AO together next week


 Mtb win puts jonny and partner into the semis.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52896
Date:

The full story:

QF:  (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61) defeated (WC) Maverick Banes & Blake Ellis (AUS/AUS) CR 695 (462+233) by 6-7(4) 6-4 [11-9]

Phew animated emoticon

*******

SF:  (3) Sander Arends & Hsieh Cheng-Peng (NED/TPE) CR 145 (70+75) vs (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52896
Date:

SF:  (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61) defeated (3) Sander Arends & Hsieh Cheng-Peng (NED/TPE) CR 145 (70+75) by 3 & 2  smile

*****

Final:  Nikola Cacic & Denys Molchanov (SRB/UKR) CR 163 (73+90) vs (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39448
Date:

Just the one doubles title down under tonight. 

 

Final:  Nikola Cacic & Denys Molchanov (SRB/UKR) CR 163 (73+90) beat (2) Marcelo Arévalo (ESA) & Jonny O'Mara CR 132 (71+61) by  7-6(3) 6-4



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard