L32: WEBLEY-SMITH, Emily (GBR) [Q] 480 v JUVAN, Kaja (SLO) [6] 133 (CH:106 Aug 19)
Well Em has picked up 6 pts and $1,050 so far. That's a free hit her next match. Winners of hers and Naiktha's matches will play each other in the L16.
L32: WEBLEY-SMITH, Emily (GBR) [Q] 480 v JUVAN, Kaja (SLO) [6] 133 (CH:106 Aug 19)
Well Em has picked up 6 pts and $1,050 so far. That's a free hit her next match. Winners of hers and Naiktha's matches will play each other in the L16.
Does she not get to keep the $600 from Qualifying as well?
L32: WEBLEY-SMITH, Emily (GBR) [Q] 480 v JUVAN, Kaja (SLO) [6] 133 (CH:106 Aug 19)
Well Em has picked up 6 pts and $1,050 so far. That's a free hit her next match. Winners of hers and Naiktha's matches will play each other in the L16.
Does she not get to keep the $600 from Qualifying as well?
Not that i know of. The draw sheet shows $600 going to q finalists, but then says $0 for qualifiers, so presumably they just get the first round pay check. So they get extra points for the q wins but not earnings, is my assumption, though I could be wrong.
As well as Em's latest doubles ranking of WR 156 being her best since June 2016 ( her 2015 CH is 113 and she has nothing to defend until April ), her latest live singles ranking of 454 would represent her best singles ranking since April 2016 ( albeit a bit to go to match her singles CH 240 from 2011 )
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 11th of November 2019 04:59:51 PM
As well as Em's latest doubles ranking of WR 156 being her best since June 2016 ( her 2015 CH is 113 and she has nothing to defend until April ), her latest live singles ranking of 454 would represent her best singles ranking since April 2016 ( albeit a bit to go to match het singles CH 180 from 2011 )
That will take her above Tara (455) and Naomi (457) - and just two places and points behind Eden (452)