I personally think it's a bit mean to have a smiling emoji for a retirement - I understand that it's for Cam winning but still.
Don't think it was meant that way.
Back in the old days, there was a convention of sorts that it was a Smiley for a Win, a big smiley for win over a higher ranked player, a sad face for a loss and a really sad face for a loss to a lower ranked opponent.
It was a "results at a glance" method of communication rather than a attempt at emotional expression.
Dan is now just one place behind Kyle in the live rankings :
41. Kyle 1165 42. Dan 1110
Would need 2 more wins, therefore reaching the SFs, to overtake Kyle this week, but surely just a matter of time, more particularly because of Kyle's further points drop offs in the coming weeks rather than his dubious form.
Be good though if Dan moves ahead in style including maybe soon taking out his existing CH 41, dating back to March 2017 prior to his year's sabbatical.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 30th of September 2019 12:23:53 PM
I personally think it's a bit mean to have a smiling emoji for a retirement - I understand that it's for Cam winning but still.
Don't think it was meant that way.
Back in the old days, there was a convention of sorts that it was a Smiley for a Win, a big smiley for win over a higher ranked player, a sad face for a loss and a really sad face for a loss to a lower ranked opponent.
It was a "results at a glance" method of communication rather than a attempt at emotional expression.
That may be true but the old days are not the days we live in now and all forums, boards, treads, blogs etc have different ways of expressing things. That is how I read it and I have been on this board for 2 years or something now so am not new-new but am just writing it how I see it (or read it)
I personally think it's a bit mean to have a smiling emoji for a retirement - I understand that it's for Cam winning but still.
Don't think it was meant that way.
Back in the old days, there was a convention of sorts that it was a Smiley for a Win, a big smiley for win over a higher ranked player, a sad face for a loss and a really sad face for a loss to a lower ranked opponent.
It was a "results at a glance" method of communication rather than a attempt at emotional expression.
That may be true but the old days are not the days we live in now and all forums, boards, treads, blogs etc have different ways of expressing things. That is how I read it and I have been on this board for 2 years or something now so am not new-new but am just writing it how I see it (or read it)
I checked the odds on the Norrie match before they started this morning and both players weren't too far from evens. I thought this was surprising given the gap in rankings....does anyone know why the odds were like this? Did Cameron's opponent perhaps have some sort of pre-existing injury or problem?
I personally think it's a bit mean to have a smiling emoji for a retirement - I understand that it's for Cam winning but still.
Don't think it was meant that way.
Back in the old days, there was a convention of sorts that it was a Smiley for a Win, a big smiley for win over a higher ranked player, a sad face for a loss and a really sad face for a loss to a lower ranked opponent.
It was a "results at a glance" method of communication rather than a attempt at emotional expression.
That may be true but the old days are not the days we live in now and all forums, boards, treads, blogs etc have different ways of expressing things. That is how I read it and I have been on this board for 2 years or something now so am not new-new but am just writing it how I see it (or read it)
I checked the odds on the Norrie match before they started this morning and both players weren't too far from evens. I thought this was surprising given the gap in rankings....does anyone know why the odds were like this? Did Cameron's opponent perhaps have some sort of pre-existing injury or problem?
Garin is known for being very much a clay court player. So maybe punters thought (quite rightly?) that his ranking is not a true one for hard courts......
I checked the odds in the Norrie match before they started this morning and both players weren't too far from evens. I thought this was surprising given the gap in rankings....does anyone know why the odds were like this? Did Cameron's opponent perhaps have some sort of pre-existing injury or problem?
I think it's because Garin is much more at home on clay courts compared to hard.
His current top 4 ranking counters ( totalling 760 of his 1336 points ) are from Munich, Houston, Sao Paolo and Santo Domingo. And the ATP site's ATP tour W/L summary for the year shows on clay he is 20/9 and on hard 5/6.
Edit: Great minds agree, fools seldom differ.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 30th of September 2019 05:25:01 PM
I checked the odds in the Norrie match before they started this morning and both players weren't too far from evens. I thought this was surprising given the gap in rankings....does anyone know why the odds were like this? Did Cameron's opponent perhaps have some sort of pre-existing injury or problem?
I think it's because Garin is much more at home on clay courts compared to hard.
His current top 4 ranking counters ( totalling 760 of his 1336 points ) are from Munich, Houston, Sao Paolo and Santo Domingo. And the ATP site's ATP tour W/L summary for the year shows on clay he is 20/9 and on hard 5/6.
Edit: Great minds agree, fools seldom differ.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 30th of September 2019 05:25:01 PM
Thanks to both, I didn't know that and hadn't heard of him before.