Great battling performances; hopefully confidence-building.
Will this improve his ranking?
I'm remembering that he won a round of USO qualies, last year.
Not a lot. He only gets an additional 3 points for this R2 win. Bit of a travesty really.
He is currently 258 in the rankings.
Most confusing thing to me with this reorganised challengers to 48 men draws. Win round 1 5 points beat a seeded player in round 2 only an extra 3. Surely this need to be looked at.
Great battling performances; hopefully confidence-building.
Will this improve his ranking?
I'm remembering that he won a round of USO qualies, last year.
Not a lot. He only gets an additional 3 points for this R2 win. Bit of a travesty really.
He is currently 258 in the rankings.
Most confusing thing to me with this reorganised challengers to 48 men draws. Win round 1 5 points beat a seeded player in round 2 only an extra 3. Surely this need to be looked at.
I agree. I have raised this point a couple of times, including earlier in this thread. I also tweeted the ATP today to ask for their comment on the reasoning. No response of course, but my tweet did get a "like" from a certain Liam Broady.
I was just jokingly saying In my earlier post that it was time the ATP answered you, not knowing that you actually had tweeted / were going to tweet them.
Still think they've lazily just chucked in the Q points from the old 32 man draws as the R1 win points in the 48 draw and left the rest unchanged, never mind the resulting illogicality.
And while a Challenger 100 goes 5, 8, 18 a Challenger 80 ( again just using the previous Q points as the R1 win points ) goes 3, 7, 15 ... So more additional points for winning R2 in an 80 as against a 100 ( 4 vs 3 ).
Gee, just needed some common sense adjustments. Try it - better late than never.