Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 29 - ITF (W60) Berkeley, USA Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:
Week 29 - ITF (W60) Berkeley, USA Hard


Q1: MOORE, Tara (GBR) 464 v ELIE, Jennifer (USA) 9 406 CH=219 19/6/17

H2H 2-0 

Dotha 2016 Clay Moore 7-5 6-2

Charlottesville 2016 Clay Moore 6-4 1-6 7-5 

 

Berkley corrected to Berkeley.

 



-- Edited by Peter too on Monday 15th of July 2019 01:56:33 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:
Week 29 - ITF (W60) Berkley, USA Hard


Peter, Berkeley has another 'e' in it in the middle... It's a famous name I always get wrong confuse



-- Edited by Michael D on Monday 15th of July 2019 07:15:40 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:
Week 29 - ITF (W60) Berkeley, USA Hard


Tara under way. Dropped her opening serve (2DF) to 30, had 40-0* in the next.
*0-2

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

First set gone 1-6 :(

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

Tara takes the second set 6-4, and levels the match

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

Q1: MOORE, Tara (GBR) 464 def ELIE, Jennifer (USA) 9 406 1-6 6-4 12-10 hmm



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Fan of Elie TA?

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Wow that's a real squeak home, especially as Tara won only 3 BPs to 5, and 64 points to 68 overall!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

No, not a fan of Elie - just a comment on one of Tara's topsy-turvey performances. She won despite really poor serve stats.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Fair enough. I knew it had gone into a decider, but left it at 3-3 in the MTB, and had to read it a couple of times to make sure she had won, was expecting to see 'lost to', ha.

Doesn't sound vintage, and while Tara could and probably should be ranked higher than she is, Elie is obviously currently higher ranked and the pre match odds were very close, plus playing a home seeded player. Hopefully she is more convincing in the next Q round, but that's a decent enough win on paper.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

We're 8 hours ahead of California so the main draw will probably be out within the next hour or so. With her drop in the rankings, Katie S won't be a seed despite being 8th on the initial 'Acceptance List', but hopefully she can get a nice enough 1st round draw to ease her way into it - will probably end up with a Brengle, Vickery or Arconada coming in off the back of a W60 title.



-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Monday 15th of July 2019 09:39:26 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

Actually Ace, the draw is out already, and Katie has kept her #8 seed. The seedings would have been based on the previous weeks rankings, so Katie's drop beat the deadline.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

Doubles

L16:- Francesca DI LORENZO (USA) / Katie SWAN (GBR) CR916 (391+525) v Brynn BOREN (USA) / Gail BRODSKY (USA) CR868 (395+473)

L16:- Sanaz MARAND (USA) / Tara MOORE (GBR) CR498 (271+227) v Yu-Chieh HSIEH (TPE) / Xiaodi YOU (CHN) CR301 (165+136) [2]


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

the addict wrote:

Actually Ace, the draw is out already, and Katie has kept her #8 seed. The seedings would have been based on the previous weeks rankings, so Katie's drop beat the deadline.


Thanks TA, I've actually been caught out with that and corrected before - think it was Katy when she was heading to Japan the other month with a higher ranking following her W60 success. I was looking to see who might have withdrew and each name I was thinking would then appear until I clicked on. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

I've done it many times myself - the extra week for the slams usually totally confuses me. Acceptance on one set, seedings on another, current ranking on another - too easy to get mixed up.

__________________
1 2 35  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard