We should still have players in the MD though - Lissey is top of the entry list, Vic Allen 4th, and Sasha Hill was 1st alt, so should also be in the MD.
I was quite interested to see how Angelica got on as I've no idea what her potential ceiling could be and whether she could in a few years get to where say a Maia/Fran currently is in 2/3 years, or just be a W15 type player into her early twenties, dipping in and out of a WTA ranking, but as DF she isn't playing. She didn't feature at all during the grass either if I remember correctly (including the British tour). It looks like her opponent has got a replacement Q1 opponent as opposed to a bye.
The LTA has two players listed under Angelica Blake - both the same age. One is rated 1.2 and has no playing history, the other is rated 10.2 and corresponds to the ITF junior profile. I don't really follow the juniors though, but am curious to learn more when they progress to the senior tour.
She's obviously still very young and kind of just starting out in the pro scene, but it's been a pretty slow few months for Vic since Bolton/Sunderland, including the Wimby juniors. Bar a couple of wins against weak Indian ladies, she's lost every match since and some you'd think would be winnable, including this one.
She's obviously still very young and kind of just starting out in the pro scene, but it's been a pretty slow few months for Vic since Bolton/Sunderland, including the Wimby juniors. Bar a couple of wins against weak Indian ladies, she's lost every match since and some you'd think would be winnable, including this one.
Yes, in Vic's case her weakness in this match was not the usual one. Her serve was ok - 61% of 1st serve in, 64% won, and 53% of 2nd serves won. Rather her weakness was return of serve, which is much less common in the women's game. Only 3 BPs earned and 2 won (vs 3), and that made the difference in the end. FOr Sasha she really fell away in the 3rd set, so don't know if she picked up some sort of niggle there.
After all, was it that her return of serve was weak or that Margaux's serve was particularly good today? We don't know how many truly UEs, as opposed to FEs, she made off the serve.
Margaux is no great shakes but she's certainly played a lot more than Vic at this level and Vic's WTA ranking is extremely misleading - she can't have been favourite in this match, evens at best.
Vic's game has a lot of holes in it at the moment. But it will get better. She's one of those tall girls with problems with movement and dynamism, and it shows her up. I think college tennis will do her the world of good.
She was the bookies pre-match favourite. That site shows she was a modal average of 1.44 which equates to 4/9, so a 4/9 vs 13/8 type match. FWIW, pretty sure Sasha and opponent were both 5/6.