Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 29 - ITF (W15) - Dijon, France - Hard


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:
Week 29 - ITF (W15) - Dijon, France - Hard


Angelica Blake makes an appearance here. Winner has to play Josephine Boualem q1 seed. For a W15 the first round is tough enough.

QR1: Angelica BLAKE (GBR) [WC] UNR/UNR Born 2000 vs Amandine CAZEAUX (FRA) [q9] UNR/718 (CH:541)

 



-- Edited by Michael D on Sunday 14th of July 2019 07:01:41 PM

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 11708
Date:

Angelica Blake did not make an appearance giving a walkover here.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

We should still have players in the MD though - Lissey is top of the entry list, Vic Allen 4th, and Sasha Hill was 1st alt, so should also be in the MD.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

I was quite interested to see how Angelica got on as I've no idea what her potential ceiling could be and whether she could in a few years get to where say a Maia/Fran currently is in 2/3 years, or just be a W15 type player into her early twenties, dipping in and out of a WTA ranking, but as DF she isn't playing. She didn't feature at all during the grass either if I remember correctly (including the British tour). It looks like her opponent has got a replacement Q1 opponent as opposed to a bye.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

The LTA has two players listed under Angelica Blake - both the same age. One is rated 1.2 and has no playing history, the other is rated 10.2 and corresponds to the ITF junior profile. I don't really follow the juniors though, but am curious to learn more when they progress to the senior tour.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

R1: ALLEN, Victoria (GBR) 3 719/UNR v Qualifier
R1: HILL, Sasha (GBR) UNR/404 v Qualifier

Alicia Barnett was top of the acceptances list but doesn't appear in the main draw.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Only 9 pairs in the doubles draw and Vic Allen and Amandine Cazeaux are the top seeds.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

R1: ALLEN, Victoria (GBR) 3 719/UNR v ORANGE, Margaux (FRA) Q UNR CH=1095 26/2/18
R1: HILL, Sasha (GBR) UNR/404 v SCHMIDT, Lara (GER) Q UNR CH=838 22/4/19

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Unfortunately being top seeds in the doubles didn't help Vic and Amandine, they lost their QF match 4-6 4-6

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23353
Date:

R1: ALLEN, Victoria (GBR) 3 719/UNR LOST TO ORANGE, Margaux (FRA) Q UNR (4)6-7 4-6

R1: HILL, Sasha (GBR) UNR/404 LOST TO SCHMIDT, Lara (GER) Q UNR 6-3 5-7 0-6



-- Edited by the addict on Wednesday 17th of July 2019 02:07:51 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Two disappointing losses those. Expected at least one if not both of them to come through.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

She's obviously still very young and kind of just starting out in the pro scene, but it's been a pretty slow few months for Vic since Bolton/Sunderland, including the Wimby juniors. Bar a couple of wins against weak Indian ladies, she's lost every match since and some you'd think would be winnable, including this one.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Ace Ventura wrote:

She's obviously still very young and kind of just starting out in the pro scene, but it's been a pretty slow few months for Vic since Bolton/Sunderland, including the Wimby juniors. Bar a couple of wins against weak Indian ladies, she's lost every match since and some you'd think would be winnable, including this one.


Yes, in Vic's case her weakness in this match was not the usual one. Her serve was ok - 61% of 1st serve in, 64% won, and 53% of 2nd serves won. Rather her weakness was return of serve, which is much less common in the women's game. Only 3 BPs earned and 2 won (vs 3), and that made the difference in the end. FOr Sasha she really fell away in the 3rd set, so don't know if she picked up some sort of niggle there.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55413
Date:

I don't think it's a question of stats.

After all, was it that her return of serve was weak or that Margaux's serve was particularly good today? We don't know how many truly UEs, as opposed to FEs, she made off the serve.

Margaux is no great shakes but she's certainly played a lot more than Vic at this level and Vic's WTA ranking is extremely misleading - she can't have been favourite in this match, evens at best.

Vic's game has a lot of holes in it at the moment. But it will get better. She's one of those tall girls with problems with movement and dynamism, and it shows her up. I think college tennis will do her the world of good.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

www.wincomparator.com/victoria-allen-id148084-margaux-orange-id165443/

She was the bookies pre-match favourite. That site shows she was a modal average of 1.44 which equates to 4/9, so a 4/9 vs 13/8 type match. FWIW, pretty sure Sasha and opponent were both 5/6.

__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard