All right, this is the real one for those I have left  

I was looking at the odds last night and saw Fett 2/7 and SBG 5/2 and was thinking that's far too short for SBG, but have since saw they have changed to 1/9 vs 5/1 which is probably more of a fair reflection. Not sure if it was a palpable error (mistake) last night or if relatively significant money went on Fett to force the change?

Naomi's is pretty much 50/50, 4/6 (NB) vs 11/10, despite the Italian being one of the lowest ranked in the Q draw. I suppose, if the rankings were 10 months instead of 12, then they would be a pretty similar ranking unfortunately.

Eden did hold, but the Latvian has as well - *5-3.

First set in the bag for Eden, 6-3.

-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Monday 25th of March 2019 09:50:15 AM

the addict wrote:

---

Good start by Eden, although she's 0-2* in the second

Out of interest, any idas what the odds were for her before the match ?

---

 4/7 Latvian, 5/4 Eden on Bet365.

That's an excellent win for Eden and a welcome 3 pts.  Julie Gervais up next, who is still higher ranked than Eden but not nearly so far ahead. 2 more points for the winner. 

QR1: Eden SILVA (GBR) 466 beat Diana MARCINKEVICA (LAT) [q2] 268 (CH:196 April 14) 6-3 2-6 10-4

FQR: Eden SILVA (GBR) 466 vs Julie GERVAIS (FRA) [q10] 403=CH

-- Edited by Michael D on Monday 25th of March 2019 03:11:45 PM

Great win. I checked back and saw the match was over, so thought surely Marcinkevica couldn't have won 2 sets in my time away, completely forgetting about the MTB again. Won that 10-4.

On the board at last - saved a set point with an ace.
Only Beth's second singles match of the year. Looking likely to be a short one as well.

Ace Ventura wrote:

---

I was looking at the odds last night and saw Fett 2/7 and SBG 5/2 and was thinking that's far too short for SBG, but have since saw they have changed to 1/9 vs 5/1 which is probably more of a fair reflection. Not sure if it was a palpable error (mistake) last night or if relatively significant money went on Fett to force the change?

Naomi's is pretty much 50/50, 4/6 (NB) vs 11/10, despite the Italian being one of the lowest ranked in the Q draw. I suppose, if the rankings were 10 months instead of 12, then they would be a pretty similar ranking unfortunately.

Eden did hold, but the Latvian has as well - *5-3.

First set in the bag for Eden, 6-3.

 

---

 I never normally bet on Naomi (sorry, Stockport's finest) but, flush from a nice little 50p flutter on Eden, I have invested 20p on Naomi - surely she's got a better chance of winning this match than those odds suggest????