Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 12 & 13 - WTA Premier Mandatory - Miami, USA - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:
Weeks 12 & 13 - WTA Premier Mandatory - Miami, USA - Hard


In general re our women it's not been a great start to the year, especially compared to a fairly sharp start to last year.

But I am more and more thinking that I am actually coming over as one of the more optimistic posters, more particularly in the medium to long term, regarding our women. I'd certainly say that that is a shift in my position on that scale in the last year or so and I feel it's more the scale of positivity / negativity has moved as folk come and go rather than that I have.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

I for one certainly didn't say that a Fed Cup doubles win with Heather was "a given". But that I was fairly confident that it would be a win if a deciding doubles. I'd make us favourites for such a doubles.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 25th of March 2019 02:00:21 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

indiana wrote:

I certainly didn't say that a doubles win with Heather was "a given". But that I was fairly confident that it would be a win if a deciding doubles.


My reply was more in response to Jon's 'I would have expected we would win the Doubles at least, as Kazakstan have no one of note...' in that the teams will be closer matched than anticipated given respective rankings, and that they will likely know their team now, whereas who knows who we will field.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

indiana wrote:

In general re our women it's not been a great start to the year, especially compared to a fairly sharp start to last year.

But I am more and more thinking that I am actually coming over as one of the more optimistic posters, more particularly in the medium to long term, regarding our women. I'd certainly say that that is a shift in my position on that scale in the last year or so and I feel it's more the scale of positivity / negativity has moved as folk come and go rather than that I have.


The beginning of last year was a very optimistic time, as Katie B, Harriet, Gabi and Katie S all soared up, and Katy D also moved upwards too. Even Laura got some good early season wins, and heavens a bit later so did Naomi. I think you have a NOT missing there Indy, ie 'that that is NOT a shift in my position...' As for mine, I must admit it is hard to be as optimistic as we were this time a year ago. This is not only because the performances have been poorer (not aided by Harriet and Katie S not having played much for months other than the Fed Cup), but also because of the transition tour fiasco. The transition tour has definitely helped turn my own perceptions re our women's future more negative, since it is much harder to see pathways now. Even for someone like Emma R, who the changes are supposed to benefit, is still struggling to get into W25s, and this week has resorted to a return to an Israeli W15, which is where it all started for her last year. But if a year later she is being forced back into the same basic level of competition, in a tournament that is now only designed to her her with W25 entries (and essentially to retain the points she won last year so her ITF ranking doesn't fall), where does that leave us? Fran has made no headway in W25s this year, nor has anyone else below her, except for one or two Eden and Freya wins. I still expect Emma to come through, but the process is slower now, and as for anyone else trying to get a foot on the WTA ladder, well good luck to them. Even Mandy C is battling head wins to get back onto the WTA tour and it's not going to happen soon. Victoria Allen? Give her another W25 WC and she'll have a WTA ranking that includes two WCs....

As for our heady last year's group, with luck Katie B and Harriet will come good and Katie will consolidate her top 100 position and Harriet get nearer. Katie S should improve when she plays again, but will drop points too if she doesn't soon. Gabi it's not clear yet, but at least she has hit a bottom now, in market terminology, and in the short term if she plays and wins some matches will regain some of her lost ground. Otherwise Jodie is the only real upward mover so far this year amongst ALL our WTA ranked women. Since Week 5 and some of the early season shaking out from the new ranking system, it's only Katie B and Jodie that have had CH's, and next week Jodie's new CH that is due then will be our first since Week 8. Last year we were often having multiple CHs every week, including down the rankings where the CHs have dried up and players being kicked out. 

So no, it's very hard to be as optimistic now as this time last year... but I'm also still waiting to see quite how the new two tour system works out, and where we are with it by later this year, since it's clear that ongoing modifications are going to continue to happen. Last year we headed into the grass season on a high. That's not what it feels like now, but maybe we still might be pleasantly surprised. Let's hope.

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Good (if not depressing) post Michael, ha.

After a very slow start, I think Maia can just about be considered a success with her 60k QF and 25k SF and both times the sole remainder to fly the flag in the home tournaments, it's just that she was defending F points from Glasgow 2018 that makes it stand out less.

We have got Bolton 25k and Sunderland 25k coming up and the latter is currently shaped to be very weak, so there could be opportunities there for some to finally get their season underway as well an interesting Turkish 60k where we could have 3 of the seeds as well as Katie S fairly high up. 2 successful weeks there, hopefully leading into Fed Cup success and then the Asian ITF scene and things could well look different, but yes, the start of the year is a big contrast to last year where there would be lots of enthusiastic Wimbledon Wildcard chat around now.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Yes too many unknowns still for any of that wildcard chat yet!!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

Oh dear. Certainly IS a shift in my position on the forum optimism scale* but as I indicated it's the scale that has particularly moved. For better or worse it has moved towards being quite a bit more critical and more pessimistic.

* I mean the overall scale has moved to being quite a bit more pessimistic where I have moved a relatively much smaller amount that way ( of course general results haven't been great ) being apparently less concerned about the short term becoming a longer term story.

I don't see a few months hugely changing the medium to long term prospects and that is much more my interest as I would have thought it would be most people's beyond the ups and downs. This is as good a group of youngish leading players as we have had in my time following our women and I expect to see good things over the rest of the year. They surely haven't as a group so lost it on a longer term basis.

Indeed, please gawd girls, buck up or your section is going to get even more depressing!

Seriously folk, say it as you think, vive la difference Just I have been rather surprised at times.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

I am perhaps more critical than many on here, but for me, it's not just a few slower months, it's more realisation of the longer term situation and the prospects / ceiling of some of our better players are not as high as hoped. If we breakdown the 8 who featured in the main draw of Wimbledon last year, the landscape has notably deteriorated:

Konta - Now the Miami and Wimbledon SF points are well and truly off as well as all the 'top 10 commitments' and the early byes that go with it, she's transitioned into a 30-50 player. That of course is still very good and I'd LOVE some of the others that I'll be mentioning to get anywhere near that level, but there's also the realisation that a PM title and grand slam latter stage run for GB women are pretty much over for the very foreseeable future.

Boulter - Fine. As I mentioned the other day, her start could have perhaps been a little bit better as she is below her current ranking in 'the race' and will have traditionally her worst part of the season coming up and may well dip back to ITFs until the grass. However, if she can remain anywhere from 70-100 and enter all the slams directly and get into a few WTA draws where we can watch on TV, picking up a few wins here and there, then that will be a very satisfying career and we'll get a lot of joy watching her do that and I hope the others in that group can get to that level.

Watson - It's not looking great. She may well have a good grass season like she did in 2017, but bar the odd run here and there, she's not going to get her 'mojo back' as has been hoped for and it's largely been very poor for 15/18 months and of course she is getting older all the time.

Dart - Very frustrating the way she's only played once and not won since her fantastic start to the season. She seemed to play well against Barthel last week, or certainly competed well anyway, and came to within 2 points of the match. Tough draw in France next week, but hopefully she can get a few wins under her belt soon and continue to surprise many. Still optimism here.

Swan - Turned 20 yesterday (happy birthday), so still young, but not crazy young and no longer involved in any top 20 of her age type conversations. She has obviously had her injury issues, which may well hold her back going forward, but she has lost all 8 matches against top 200 players since August, some were tough players and injuries would have affected others, but that run isn't by accident, and for me, especially when you see all the talented younger overseas players really pushing on, far too many to mention, it's more of case of longer term, can she get to where Boulter is now, rather than can get to where Jo currently is and beyond.

G Taylor - probably the most disappointing. This time last year there was an unknown excitement and genuine talk of Fed Cup debuts and pushing towards the top 100 by the end of 2018. A year later and she's fighting to defend points just to stay inside the top 300. Like Katie S she is young and may have a good few months coming up, but for the next year at best, it'll be trying to get back towards her career high rather than trying to get to where KB is now, and with the poor year, losing a lot at the higher level, for me that unknown / excitement factor has gone and it's more of a case of hoping she can achieve the best she can.

Dunne - I always thought she was a bit behind last years young WC chasing pack, so it's not a huge surprise to me that she has lost circa 100 places off her ranking this past year. She's obviously older than the rest of that group and a year older than when she was reaching 25k SF finals, so it's more of a case now of can she get back into GS qual contention rather than can she push towards where HD, GT, KS were around the grass season, 150-170ish.

Broady - it's not good is it. Literally 6 match wins since mid May, one to somebody unranked, one to #440 and 2 others outside the top 300. She's losing at 25k and 60k quals level now and that's a far cry from almost reaching Monterrey QF last year and the low ranking is going to make it so much harder for her to get anything going.

The new system is making it harder for the likes of Eden, Tara, Alicia and SBG to progress as Michael was saying. They might pick up the odd qualifying win here and there, but that won't really give them points and they seem so far away from the top 300. Emily can't seem to win at 25k level.

Jodie and Maia have been a positive and hopefully they can push on and give us extra interest in Grand Slam qualifying in the next year or so.


__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1222
Date:

A very good summation there Ace. I certainly am feeling less optimistic than I was at this stage last year but you are right, a cold dose of realism has probably swept in.

As well as the above, I had continued to hope that Laura might somehow make it back but every week that goes by without her playing will make that harder. She was an Alt for the French 60k this week but didnt get in so playing in Bolton and Sunderland are vital for her. She now only has 3 counters so will drop off the WTA rankings at the beginning of May unless she can replace the two one pointers that she has. In reality if she does drop off (and with the double whammy of no ITF ranking either), I just cant see how she will even get into any tournaments to get started again.

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1858
Date:

In the players review mention is made of the Grand Slam latter stage run for GB women is pretty much over for the foreseeable future. It is a sobering thought that if you consider the time gap between Jo Durie's  semi final at the 1983  US Open and Jo Konta's semi-final at the 2016 Australian Open with the same time gap our next ladies semi finalist at a Grand Slam will be the 2049 US Open. Similarly if you take Virginia Wade's semi final at Wimbledon in 1978 and Jo's 39 years later, then our next ladies Wimbledon semi finalist will in 2056. A long time off.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

Where I will share concerns is the effects of the transition tour and I join in the moans in various threads.

Re the players as a whole I stand by my more optimistic thoughts looking longer term though clearly there is much truth in many of the individual points of concern.

In general, without bull****ting I will personally always in general more highlight British players' rises and progress than falls and regression ( while not hiding losses ). For that is the British Tennis forum I joined and have for most time been part of. No pretence at neutrality ( more highlight such as CHs, titles and progress ) and I like it that way.

We know some players have over time read the forum. They will know as well as anyone when things aren't going well so don't need told, though no doubt expect to see some fair negative comment. But support from this forum I am sure is valued.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

I think we try to be encouraging but realistic Indy, I'm not sure anything else is too helpful. And we're all looking for the green shoots at the moment, so let's hope we see a few more in the next months or so lead up to the grass season. Where there are green shoots we may tend to overhype often, but you can't do that when the shoots are very few and far between.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

I too am realistic, well I think so - in actually what I think and say players can achieve and predictions. And am happy to discuss these. Back me up in Davis Cup doubles if you play, Hev! 

As I said, just in general coverage I prefer to accentuate the positive moves and more let the less good happen and hope that it can turn unless when I have the occasional strange concept that I might have anything useful to add re solutions. I guess there are others of similar mind to different degrees. 

Anyway, as also said, we are all different and that's clearly fine whatever my reservations. So it's maybe simpler if I don't in future get into the realms of my and others' positivity and negativity. 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

I noticed all the way through tennis abstract using their elo surface specific forecasting have had Barty as favourite to win this week. Lo and behold she is now in the semis and still their favourite. But she clearly isn't ranked in the top few and it seemed quite a wild call, albeit right so far.

Anyone any insights on how Barty would have been favourite? How did the bookies rate her ?

__________________
JonH


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

JonH wrote:

I noticed all the way through tennis abstract using their elo surface specific forecasting have had Barty as favourite to win this week. Lo and behold she is now in the semis and still their favourite. But she clearly isn't ranked in the top few and it seemed quite a wild call, albeit right so far.

Anyone any insights on how Barty would have been favourite? How did the bookies rate her ?


I know her odds at Bet 365 were 1/2 (Barty) vs 13/8 (Bertens) in their L16 match which I was very surprised about, with Bertens being higher ranked and no longer considered a clay court specialist with 3 hard titles to her name since the US Open swing. I didn't see the pre match Kvitova odds, but when I went to bed after the rain delay with Barty 2-1* up going with serve, it was 10/11 Barty, 4/5 Kvitova.

She is in really good form mind. If you set that Coric scoring system to just after Wimbledon 2018 (where she didn't do as good as she would have expected), she would be 7th in the rankings, or 9th without these 390 (thus far) Miami points and that's even without any Beijing PM or Dubai P5 points as well (so 1900 on offer) as she withdrew from both - she's proving to be so hard to beat at the moment.

Edit - Barty did win that WTA 2nd tier title in Zhuhai, but got less points for that than both Pliskova and Bertens did just for reaching the WTA Finals semi finals in Singapore, and 880 less than Svitolina for winning that event. The WTA finals really does help protect those top players because the likes of Kerber got 500 points just for winning one match and losing the other 2 - that's more than she would for winning prestigious events like Stuttgart or Eastbourne. 

 



-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Wednesday 27th of March 2019 10:01:44 AM

__________________
«First  <  111 12 13 14  >  Last»  | Page of 14  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard