Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 10 & 11 - WTA Premier Mandatory ($9.035M) - Indian Wells, CA, USA - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:
Weeks 10 & 11 - WTA Premier Mandatory ($9.035M) - Indian Wells, CA, USA - Hard


QR1: (q18) Heather Watson WR 113 vs Sara Errani (ITA) WR 234 (CH 5 in May 2013)

QR1: (q6) Katie Boulter WR 85 vs Allie Kiick (USA) WR 145 (CH 136 in September 2014)

 

Each have Swiss players as the other seeds in their section : Heather has (q3) Stefanie Voegele WR 109 and Katie has (q14) Victorija Golubic WR 82 who has just won the Indian Wells 125 title (hence her ranking and of course Indian Wells familiarity). 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

Errani hasn't done much, particularly since her second enforced layoff, so if Heather loses, I will eat my hat.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4027
Date:

Yes, but it's not like Heather's exactly playing well, she got knocked out in R1 last week.

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

flamingowings wrote:

Errani hasn't done much, particularly since her second enforced layoff, so if Heather loses, I will eat my hat.


Oh no, I hope it's an edible one FW! As Helen says, absolutely anything is possible with Heather... she is an expert at pulling out defeats from the jaws of victory... Of course this should be a comfortable win but... Oh come on Heather, do something decent for a change! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Not the best draw for Katie. As Indi says, Golubic is ranked ahead of her now and that's unfortunate considering Katie was one of the higher seeds, but even before she can think of that, she has someone who has a 3-0 H2H over her including one in Washington late last year, Kiick has also a lot higher ranked now since their last meeting and the books have it 5/6 vs 5/6.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

As for Watson, who knows. Errani has lost both matches since her lengthy layoff (including to Kiick last week) but Hev is Hev. Too close to call that one I think.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

Errani was in fact WR 143 last week (not bad for effectively just a few months of tennis before that layoff). I just looked for the reason behind her big rankings drop to this week and it is due to her having won the Indian Wells 125 last year ( without dropping a set).

In last week's reenactment she was, as said, beaten by Kiick in R1 in 3 sets. Kiick was then thumped by Kanepi.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 4th of March 2019 09:19:02 AM

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1435
Date:

I agree with Ace, Hev's match is too close to call. I certainly don't agree that Hev should beat Errani comfortably. Since her return she has lost to Bencic, an in-form Jorovic and Kiick. Not easy matches.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

Is it right they get 2 ranking points for winning one match, and 20 for qualifying?! Or is that an error on the drawsheet?

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1435
Date:

It's an error.
2 points for losing Q1, 20 points for final QR, 30 points for qualifying

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 339
Date:

Is there any reason why Harriet is not entered in the qualifying? Has she played since the Fed Cup?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Boulter follows Kozlova-Kratzer on Court 6. Play starts at 7pm UK, so we're probably looking at around 9pm for that. There must have been a little bit of money gone on Kiick since this morning as she is now the 4/6 slight fave. Errani is actually the same odds in her match with Hev.

Watson is 3rd on Court 3, following Kruger-Vikhlyantseva and Gibbs-Ferro, so roughly 10.30/11pm.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

hoots wrote:

Is there any reason why Harriet is not entered in the qualifying? Has she played since the Fed Cup?


That remains a mystery. Her last singles match was exactly 7 weeks ago against Sharapova. She entered IW but withdrew last week and was still training in London a few days ago.

Whether she picked up a knock at the Fed Cup or just had her confidence knocked a bit by that double bagel and wants to work on a few things, who knows, but it does feel like ages and would be good to see her back in (single's) action soon to build on her great start to the year - it does seem like a chance missed to progress even further. 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

Edible hat at the ready folks! wink



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40888
Date:

I'd never risk my hat on a tennis match!

__________________
1 2 313  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard