For definition purposes, based on birth year. No player born in the 90s has won a slam, and it is 2019 now!. I feel a whole generation, the 'lost gen' and maybe 'current gen' could possibly never win a slam. Next gen seems very strong.
The lost gen will rank amongst the worst generation of tennis players in history. The current gen and to a greater extent, next gen have proven far more of challenge to the old gen than the lost gen ever did.
Old gen:Federer, Karlovic, Lopez, Kohlschreiber, Verdasco, Seppi
Old gen II: Nadal, Novak, Murray, Wawrinka, Anderson, Berdych, Monfils, Gasquet, Fognini, Isner, Del Potro, Cillic
The lost gen :Nishikori, Steve Johnson, Paire, Raonic, Goffin, Dimitrov, Swartzman, Tomic
Current Gen: Thiem, Edmund, Pouille, Kyrgios, Norrie, Coric, Khachanov, Medvedev,
Next Gen: Zverev, Rublev, Tstispas, Tiafoe, Shapavalov, de Minaur.
-- Edited by Vandenburg on Sunday 1st of September 2019 09:44:07 PM
From what I saw in the last two weeks, it would only take a niggling injury to Djokovic to give Raonic a strong shot at Wimbledon this year. Of course, this also relies on Raonic staying healthy and continuing his upward trajectory.
From what I saw in the last two weeks, it would only take a niggling injury to Djokovic to give Raonic a strong shot at Wimbledon this year. Of course, this also relies on Raonic staying healthy and continuing his upward trajectory.
The last time we saw such a failed generation was decades or so ago. No player born between 77 and 79 ever won a slam. But this even more of a fail, we are possibly talking about a 1990 to 1994.
who knows, it could even be that no one born in the 90s ever wins a slam. A massive stretch, but if say the big three keep winning slams for another year or two, then the likes of Félix Auger-Aliassime, Jannik Sinner etc could then take over. A huge stretch as I said, maybe possible that no one born before 1998 is more likely...