Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 34 - WTA Premier ($799K) - New Haven, USA - Hard


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1258
Date:
Week 34 - WTA Premier 12 ($799K) - New Haven, USA - Hard


Jo holds 5-5*

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1258
Date:

Jo breaks to 40! *6-5 and about to serve for the match.

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1258
Date:

Jo holds eventually to 40. 6-3 7-5.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7945
Date:

Phew!
Well done Jo

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 40890
Date:

Well done Jo.

By the way re the thread title I am not aware of WTA Premier 12 as any sort of general term.

Yes there are 4 Premier Mandatories, 5 Premier 5s and 12 Premiers. But Premiers is simply what they are called and so maybe we should stick to "WTA Premier".

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

indiana wrote:

By the way re the thread title I am not aware of WTA Premier 12 as any sort of general term.


WTA nomenclature, on their PDF of ranking points per round per level since they introduced the tier.

R32: Johanna KONTA (GBR) 46 defeated Laura SIEGEMUND (GER) 146 6-2 7-5

R16: Johanna KONTA (GBR) 46v. Carla SUÁREZ NAVARRO (ESP) 30 (CH 6, Feb. 2016)
> H2H 2-0
> 2018 Qatar, Qatar - WTA Premier 5 - Hard - R32 - Konta by 6-2 6-2
> 2016 Wuhan, China - WTA Premier 5 - Hard - R16 - Konta by 7-5 7-6(6)

Carla played quite well in Montreal & Cininnati - Her current level is pretty close to Johanna's, I find it hard to predict the match.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Jo 2018 (completed matches - excluding Fed Cup):

Up to completion of Wimbledon:
Record: 17-15 (53.13%)
Average Rank of players faced: 55.81
Average Rank of Player Defeated: 58.81
Average Rank of opponent when losing: 48.47

Since Wimbledon:Andrew Murray message board
Record: 5-3 (62.50%)
Average Rank of players faced: 50
Average Rank of Player Defeated: 69.20 (one of those was a WR95 Azarenka, and Siegemunds WR146 throws things out a bit)
Average Rank of opponent when losing: 18

If she loses against Carla, then the win % will be 55.56 % - pretty much in line with the ratio prior to the US hard court season.

So, the real world impact thus far of any perceived improvement appears slight



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

AliBlahBlah wrote:

Jo 2018 (completed matches - excluding Fed Cup):

Up to completion of Wimbledon:
Record: 17-15 (53.13%)
Average Rank of players faced: 55.81
Average Rank of Player Defeated: 58.81
Average Rank of opponent when losing: 48.47

Since Wimbledon:Andrew Murray message board
Record: 5-3 (62.50%)
Average Rank of players faced: 50
Average Rank of Player Defeated: 69.20 (one of those was a WR95 Azarenka, and Siegemunds WR146 throws things out a bit)
Average Rank of opponent when losing: 18

If she loses against Carla, then the win % will be 55.56 % - pretty much in line with the ratio prior to the US hard court season.

So, the real world impact thus far of any perceived improvement appears slight


 interesting stats. How does it look if one compares WTA points won per event in each period , which is what the real world actually runs on....



__________________
JonH


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:
RE: Week 34 - WTA Premier ($799K) - New Haven, USA - Hard


JonH wrote:
AliBlahBlah wrote:

[...]


 interesting stats. How does it look if one compares WTA points won per event in each period , which is what the real world actually runs on....


2018 points :
to end of Wimbledon: 948
Since the above: 206

Given the types of events, frequency, points available etc, I'm not sure how to compare points. Even on a points per week basis.

You could say:
In the first level equivalent event in each phase:
Jo scored 100 points in each Premier 12
105 points in each of her first Premier 5's

105 points in her second Premier 5 in phase 1, but only 1 point in the second Premier 5 in phase 2.

But I don't think that really shows much useful.

 

NB: I have changed the thread title as instructed.



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2417
Date:

I couldnt care less what those stats say, she is clearly playing a lot better.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Since Wimbledon:Andrew Murray message board
Record: 5-3 (62.50%)
Average Rank of players faced: 50
Average Rank of Player Defeated: 69.20 (one of those was a WR95 Azarenka, and Siegemunds WR146 throws things out a bit)
Average Rank of opponent when losing: 18

Well, the one point the stats are clearly making is that Jo has lost only to the much better players post-Wimbledon and is not losing to players around her current ranking as she was previously. So this stat does show an improvement in her performances. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55434
Date:

Connecticut Open

@connecticutopen

.@JohannaKonta has withdrawn from singles and doubles at #CTOpenTennis with a viral illness, handing a walkover to @CarlaSuarezNava

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

Oh no

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Hopefully this is the normal 'viral illness' on the WTA which is usually shorthand for, 'has to give a reason for withdrawing to prepare for another tournament, and viral illness is the most widely accepted non-specific symptom that everybody tends to accept without question'.
i.e. an excuse - Kiki Bertens & Ashleigh Brty also cited a 'viral illness' when withdrawing here. I'd be pretty much astonished if all three don't appear in Flushing Meadows, and compete with skill and success, hopefully, very much including Johanna

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23358
Date:

If Jo had withdrawn before her first match I'd have totally agreed with you ABB. I'm just surprised that she played yesterday and withdrew today, so I do hope that it is nothing too serious.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard