So he will go top 200, and if that is relatively a couple of months later than Kyle he could win his first challenger title just a bit before Kyle. Nearly a whole month had passed since Kyle turned 20 when he won the Hong Kong Challenger. Great that they both have done and continue to do so well.
Anyway, all in all not bad on his supposedly least preferred surface, though I wasn't entirely convinced re his supposed reasons for preferring clay and grass, or at least little reason not to think that he could be successful on hard courts, as he has shown.
It's good to have benchmarks I suppose but Kyle and Jay are different players so does it matter if Jay is in the top 200 later than Kyle?
Jay has done very well and hope he can win the final.
To be fair I think Indi was just saying that the two of them are on similar progress paths rather than highlighting the difference. In truth, there is very little between them and even that shouldn't matter as all players mature at different rates anyway.
Comparisons can sometimes be more "fun" than "relevant".
-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Saturday 28th of July 2018 05:40:58 PM
So one year on from Cam Norrie beating Jordan Thompson in the Binghamton final for his first challenger title, Jay will set forth on a very similar mission.
I get the impression Thompson can be very good but can go missing at times.
The 4 pm BST doubles final is soon to start. Jay follows that final and awards ceremony.