Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 19 - ITF ($60K) - Lu'an, China- Hard


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1435
Date:
Week 19 - ITF ($60K) - Lu'an, China- Hard


Emily and Harriet have both drawn a qualifier. Qualifiers yet to be decided. Harriet is seeded 4.

They are both in doubles, Emily with Nika Kukharchuk and Harriet with Ankita Raina. Harriet+ is seeded 3. Unfortunately they meet in the 1st round.

-- Edited by RedSquirrel on Monday 7th of May 2018 09:37:52 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Yeah, still a FQR to come, but when you see someone in the main draw ranked 655 (without needing a WC), you'd like to think they, particularly Harriet, would be too strong for an even lower ranked Q.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

By an absolutely massive margin, this is the weakest $60K of the 10 such events held globally in 2018 to date; it is in fact weaker than 50% of all $25K held globally in 2018 so far.
Full details later today in charts thread.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10668
Date:

Harriet playing with Ankita, and they draw Em and Nina.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

R32: Harriet DART (GBR) [4] 214=CH vs QUALIFIER
R32: Emily WEBLEY-SMITH (GBR) 585 vs QUALIFIER

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Ankita used to be a fairly regular partner for Emily, so ironic she is partnering with Harriet against Emily this week, first up. Harriet and Ankita are ahead on the numbers, but I'm afraid when it comes to doubles, it's Emily I'm behind. Nika reached a 25k US doubles SF last week.

R16: HARRIET DART/ Ankita RAINA (GBR/IND) [3] 405 (197+208) vs Emily WEBLEY-SMITH/ Nika KUKHARCHUK (GBR/RUS) 730 (230+500)

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Qualifiers placed - Both Brits get Chinese players

Both are WR in the 700's, 18-19 years old, and had average junior careers (JCH100-250).

Both Brits should really be winning here.



-- Edited by blob on Tuesday 8th of May 2018 07:03:04 AM

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Meanwhile, the Brits are currently facing off against each other in the doubles.
Harriet & Ankita edge out the first set from Emily & Nika, 6-4

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10668
Date:

Harriet and Ankita win 64 63.

Em and partner had their chances in the first set to get ahead and to get back level but lost the critical deuce points mid-way through.

Disappointing Em couldn't build on last week and I was a little surprised she wasn't playing with Ankita herself. Perhaps Harriet and Ankita understandably just wanted to play with the higher ranked girl to give themselves the best possible chance of progress.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

It is indeed the seeds who win here.

R16: HARRIET DART/ Ankita RAINA (GBR/IND) [3] 405 (197+208) beat Emily WEBLEY-SMITH/ Nika KUKHARCHUK (GBR/RUS) 730 (230+500) 6-4 6-3

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

R1: WEBLEY-SMITH, Emily (GBR) 585 v JIANG, Xinyu (CHN) Q 711 CH=561 29/5/17 

R1: DART, Harriet (GBR) 4 214 v TANG, Qianhui (CHN) Q 783 CH=669 7/8/17 17yo JCH=232



-- Edited by Peter too on Thursday 10th of May 2018 02:49:22 PM

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1435
Date:

Harriet not hanging around 4-1* up in 15 minutes.
EWS went down an early break in a long 2nd game, but recovered it and broke again. 4-2*

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

First set to the Dartist, 6-2

Emily serving for the first set, *5-4

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Emily duly wraps up that first set, slow to start the second, 6-4 *0-3

Harriet 6-2 *1-1

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

The end of the second set in Emily's match happened quickly, and now there is an MTO, 6-4 3-6

Harriet wraps up an efficient days work, 6-2 6-3

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.

1 2 38  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard