Gabi *3-4.

Some huge parasol moving entertainment.

*5-4 Gabi. Serving for the match. Please put this (and me) to bed please Taylor.

Gabi breaks for *5-4 and a disappointingly undemonstrative by Konig to the last point of the game.

Now 3 MPs.

Yay !!!

R2: TAYLOR, Gabriella (GBR) 1 178 def KONIG, Pia (AUT) 620 6-1 6-4
R2: DUNNE, Katy (GBR) 5 236 def OZEKI, Michika (JPN) Q 659 6-3 6-0

QF: TAYLOR, Gabriella (GBR) 1 178 v HIVES, Zoe (AUS) 6 262 =CH
H2H 1-1
Mornington 2017 KONIG 6-4 2-6 4-6
Launceston 2018 TAYLOR 7-5 6-1

QF: DUNNE, Katy (GBR) 5 236 v HOZUMI, Eri (JPN) 2 180 CH=144 2014
H2H 2-6
Australian Open Junior 2012 HOZUMI-3 6-7(6) 3-6
Toowoomba 2015 HOZUMI 1-6 4-6
Brisbane 2015 HOZUMI 0-6 1-6
Canberra 2016 HOZUMI 3-6 2-6
Brisbane 2016 HOZUMI 0-6 3-6
Canberra 2016 HOZUMI 2016
Lexington 2017 DUNNE 6-2 7-5
Perth 2018 DUNNE 6-4 6-1

Hi Ace,

I've no idea what posts got deleted yesterday but I don't think the mods are very heavy-handed - maybe it was the original poster deleting their own posts for some reason?

Generally, you can post whatever you like about a result (any result) in any tournament.

I guess if you started doing it consistently about a certain foreign player, or only about foreign matches, then someone would comment and point out this is a forum for British tennis interest. Which would be quite right. There are other forums that are country-neutral. But there's no fixed rules (that I know of) and a lot of leeway granted - which is one of things that is nice about this forum - people don't jump down your throat at the first chance.

Wasn't me guv re the deletions and does on the face of it seem a bit strange as I am not aware of any consistent issue re other results/scores being posted and the odd one or two that takes someone's interest is fine. There is also often a clear point to that interest that may interest others too.

And in the bigger tournaments people, including myself, regularly diverge into results and comments regarding foreign players.

In truth very little ever gets deleted, and more just of potentially libelous, arguably ( or not so arguably ) offensive or irritatingly repetitive nature.

I can't remember anything getting deleted except Kitchen Spam.
Even when a players parent started getting quite aggressive one time many years ago (I leave the details purposefully vague), the full discussion was left untouched.
Occasionally a post will get sanctioned by ActiveBoard automatically, and put in holding awaiting Mod approval. In my experience the usual course for this is the inclusion of a shortened hyperlink.
There was also the occasion on which ISF got banned by accident.
But none of that is deletion.