indiana wrote:

---

And so the doubles SF scheduled for not before 11.30 am local gets going just before 2 pm. The following doubles final is due at not before 1 pm. Err indeed.

Emily 2-1*. Had 2 BPs in the second game.

---

 Who had the BP chances? Emily in the 2nd game in the match or the opponent in Emily's 2nd service game?

indiana wrote:

---

Ace Ventura wrote:

---

indiana wrote:

---

And so the doubles SF scheduled for not before 11.30 am local gets going just before 2 pm. The following doubles final is due at not before 1 pm. Err indeed.

Emily 2-1*. Had 2 BPs in the second game.

---

 Who had the BP chances? Emily in the 2nd game in the match or the opponent in Emily's 2nd service game?

---

 Emily had 40-15* in the second game of the match.

---

Thought that's what you meant, but I had noticed Detiuc's odds had actually slightly shortened from the pre match odds, even at 2-1 so thought she may have been putting the pressure on.

On a side note, how can you tell if someone has quoted you on here?

blob wrote:

---

Ace Ventura wrote:

---

[...]

On a side note, how can you tell if someone has quoted you on here?

---

You can't.
Best you can do is subscribe to every thread you post in, and then you'll be sent an email whenever there is a subsequent post. It won't tell you whether that was in relation to any of your posts though.
The button to subscribe to a thread is at the bottom right of the page, as shown below (you need to be signed in for it to allow the subscription)

---

Thanks.

Looking lie a close set with break chances for both. I'd imagine they'd both won a similar amount of points, but 3 BPs now for the Czech, so a huge chance to break and serve for the set.

Apparently she switched earlier this month to Czech.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anastasia_De&

The ITF scores still have her as Moldovan but otherwise on the ITF and WTA sites she is shown as Czech.