Doubles movers

Strongbow · All-time great

RE: Doubles movers

Strongbow · All-time great

Strongbow · All-time great

09/03/20

WTA

Morton sisters up 20 to 1310. 1 from Sunderland
Tanysha Dissanayake up 50 to 1190. 1 from Sunderland
Esther Adeshina up 4 to 975. 1 from Sunderland
Pitak sisters up 30 to 645. 9 from Sunderland replace 1
Anna Popescu up 112 to 572. 30 from Altenkirchen
Olivia Nicholls up 96 to 388. 50 from Sunderland
Alicia Barnett up 51 to 304. 50 from Sunderland replace 9
Johanna Konta up 40 to 250. 60 from Monterray

A good week in the doubles biggrin

telstar · Strong Club Player

Strongbow wrote:
09/03/20
WTA

Morton sisters up 20 to 1310. 1 from Sunderland
Tanysha Dissanayake up 50 to 1190. 1 from Sunderland
Esther Adeshina up 4 to 975. 1 from Sunderland
Pitak sisters up 30 to 645. 9 from Sunderland replace 1
Anna Popescu up 112 to 572. 30 from Altenkirchen
Olivia Nicholls up 96 to 388. 50 from Sunderland
Alicia Barnett up 51 to 304. 50 from Sunderland replace 9
Johanna Konta up 40 to 250. 60 from Monterray
A good week in the doubles

Yes. Especially as career highs for seven of the players- Esther, Anna, Alicia plus the two pairs of sisters.

Strongbow · All-time great

Our current doubles players.

the addict · Tennis legend

Not bad for a top ten - 1914 total, better than the top ten singles. No-one outstanding though, all close together.

Strongbow · All-time great

Strongbow wrote:
Our current doubles players.

The only real change is Sam moving up to 165 (516 pts) ahead of Eden and Harriet.

Strongbow · All-time great

For Oct. 12th

indiana · Tennis legend

I'm not sure how Naomi has managed to lose points but that's certainly what the WTA site shows as well as her counters being down from 20 to 18.

the addict · Tennis legend

Strange. Coric shows Naomi at #140 on their official rankings with 611 points from 11 counters, and 9 non-counters (including 10 points from Wimbledon ?). But it shows her official ranking as 140 which agrees with the WTA

Strongbow · All-time great

The only way I can get the totals to match would be if she lost 42 from Gifu (Apr 30-May 5, 2019) replaced by 15 from Toronto (Oct 29-Nov 3, 2019). I don't understand what the new rules are and the WTA doesn't explain them clearly. But at least it adds up. confuse

-- Edited by Strongbow on Tuesday 13th of October 2020 09:42:32 PM

the addict · Tennis legend

Isn't it just best eleven points ? Coric include Gifu, but not Toronto

JonH comes home · Tennis legend

the addict wrote:
Strange. Coric shows Naomi at #140 on their official rankings with 611 points from 11 counters, and 9 non-counters (including 10 points from Wimbledon ?). But it shows her official ranking as 140 which agrees with the WTA

Isnt her official ranking 148? Live rankings also show her as 148 on 584 points.

the addict · Tennis legend

JonH comes home wrote:
the addict wrote:
Strange. Coric shows Naomi at #140 on their official rankings with 611 points from 11 counters, and 9 non-counters (including 10 points from Wimbledon ?). But it shows her official ranking as 140 which agrees with the WTA
Isnt her official ranking 148? Live rankings also show her as 148 on 584 points.

Sorry, I confused myself - live ranking 140, official ranking 148 according to Coric

Strongbow · All-time great

the addict wrote:
Isn't it just best eleven points ? Coric include Gifu, but not Toronto

I think Coric has become an Ads-site. New owners - not sure how reliable their tables are. cry cry