QR1: Heather WATSON (GBR) [q3] 74 v. ROberta VINCI (ITA) 132 (CH 7, Sept. 2016)
H2H: 2-1 2015 Rome, Italy - WTA Premier 5 - Clay - R64 - Watson by 6-3 6-1 2015 Hobart, Australia - WTA International - Hard - QF - Watson by 7-6(0) 6-2 2012 Birmingham, UK - WTA Premier 12 - Grass - R16 - Vinci by 6-3 4-6 6-1
3 qualifying rounds. The other seed in Hev's section is Petkovic [q8] WR101
__________________
Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.
I always thought with Heathers game she would have a very stable career. Hovering around the 30-50 mark with nothing spectacular.
She decided to go all unstable on us. I quite admire the choice a little while ago now to change up to a more aggressive game. But she has so far never been consistently comfortable with it and still seems too often in two minds. There remains though a player there who is certainly capable of moving up again much higher in the rankings and if it ever all clicks on a consistent basis who knows ...
Just to mention that Kvitova won here, and did so, all week, in that amazing manner she gets in to every so often where everything flows, everything works and it is glorious to behold and unbeatable.
A smiling Petra guarantees a smiling me. Amazing to think where she was this time last year, unsure if she could ever play again.
I've always thought that, adjusted for age, era, every possible factor you care to imagine, take the best tennis of any woman you care to name, and somehow usefully, magically, scale them all out together: for me Serena wins every time, on probability, most of them at least 9 times out of ten. Serena's best beats everybody elses best, and I have no prevarication, no hesitation, no equivocation; some are close, but not too close to call.
The only exception I make is Petra. Petra's very very best against Serena's very very best. Lawd how long I have hoped we'd see that match, but it's never come to pass. For me, this would be the ultimate, the two highest points of quality. We'll almost certainly never see it now, which is all the more frustrating, as being from the same era, and with long overlap - neither past their best, or just coming up, their primes overlapped - there was a fair chance it could happen, unlike inter-generational debates.
Anyway, well done Petra. Pojd!
__________________
Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.
Rather remarkable too that Kiki Mladenovic was the singles runner-up to Petra here given she had lost 15 singles matches in a row since Washington at beginning of August ( though she is fresh from winning the Aussie Open doubles title with Babos ). If she'd actually won the final I was ready to add her to the "Remarkable non-GB thread."
Defending the title here and with much more to come off over the next few months she had looked ready to drop like a stone in the rankings.
As it is she just drops 3 places for now, to WR 13. With Julia Goerges ( semi finalist here ) passing her, Jo will remain as WR 11. Goerges makes it into the top 10 for the first time at age 29.
Re: Petra. I see her as like a female Delpo - much liked by everyone. Sure she may get some P3tra comments (and she herself is aware of that nickname!) Delpo also comes in for a lot of admiration.
Be interesting to see if the more ball bangers like Serena, Petra and the pova one can come back to the fore over the run for miles and retrieve everything, well at least when playing each other anyway ( and give us great matches! ) players currently at the top of the rankings.