Discussed in the Stu Fraser Times article I posted on his dedicated thread earlier.
Yes, but better in the Telegraph article that I posted - as it highlights the 'double-standards' of the LTA in a way that Stu Fraser fails to do, in his 'softer' version
Discussed in the Stu Fraser Times article I posted on his dedicated thread earlier.
And?
And that was my way of giving a bit more prominence to Charlie's Go Fund Me page. Clearly, however, you didn't read it that way.
Just posting this in a kindly way, SC, but Blue_Belle has a point
If you'd wanted to give it prominence, you could possibly have said: 'Yes, good luck to Charlie, hope people donate to his Go Fund Me page, it was interesting to read about him in the two press articles previously posted'
Doing it your way comes across rather more as 'I put that up first, you're late, it's already been talked about'
As said, it's meant kindly, just to show how some might read it
Hey BlueBelle - I know, I was making a poor attempt at irony.
There is a thing here. A lot of us dont read a lot of the content - we may dip in a page and read the last post but I certainly never read up the post thread. And miss a lot. Its easy, doesnt mean anything in terms of respect to the poster, busy lives, different interests etc.
But it is then very easy for the same link or content to get posted in more than one place. Its not a race and its not disrespectful and its totally an ok thing to do!
I hardly read any individual threads and not really Charlie Rs so would have missed whatever Lambda is commenting on. So good that BlueBelle posted something similar