Bob in Spain wrote:I really thought that set had got away from Alex but he finally sealed it 13-11 in the breaker on what was his 7th or 8th set point. (I lost count)
I really thought that set had got away from Alex but he finally sealed it 13-11 in the breaker on what was his 7th or 8th set point. (I lost count)
Yeah, interesting that the two worst shots Pavic played in that TB were on of his two set points.
Alex was solid - consistently good/very good from the back half of the court, consistently pretty poor in the front half.
He deserved the set
Coup Droit wrote:Bob in Spain wrote:I really thought that set had got away from Alex but he finally sealed it 13-11 in the breaker on what was his 7th or 8th set point. (I lost count) Yeah, interesting that the two worst shots Pavic played in that TB were on of his two set points.Alex was solid - consistently good/very good from the back half of the court, consistently pretty poor in the front half.He deserved the set
Yes. That backhand slice into the base of the net when Alex was pretty much off the court was particularly poor.
Pity Alex couldn't hang on to his early break in the 2nd set.
3-3*
Bob in Spain wrote:Pavic has served better and better as the match has gone on. Going to be tough to break him.
Pavic has served better and better as the match has gone on. Going to be tough to break him.
Exactly what I was just thinking....
Yes I suspect chances may be fleeting so important to keep holding and then to take any chances that do come his way. But Pavic does seem the guy with the momentum as he goes *15-40 on Alex's serve.
indiana wrote:Got out of that game with a little help. 2-2*
Got out of that game with a little help. 2-2*
Yes. As before, Pavic has played some surprisingly poor shots on break points/set points in tie-break.
But he certainly looks the more dynamic.
Just wonder if those poor shots are a sign that he might have trouble in clutch points that he should win.