Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 37 - ITF ($25K) - Redding, USA Hard


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:
Week 37 - ITF ($25K) - Redding, USA Hard


Katie only serving @ 41%, but winning ~90% of those points.
Close set, with only 3 BP (of which 2 for Katie).
Katie leads, up a break , 5-2*
Here's a set point, 40-30*...
Deuce. Veselinovic eventually holds.
Serving for the set then, *5-3


__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Fourth set point = set secured, 6-3

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

And there's an MTO.

Somewhat frustratigly, having ousted Harriet yesterday, Ula Radwanska then gave a w/o today befire her match against Chanel Simmonds. Simmonds thus awaits the winner of this match.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Katie served for the match, but broken, 6-3 5-3*

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

So, broke right back to win, with pleasing symmetry, 6-3 6-3

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

Yay, good stuff. Finn, Katie, I just need to question players' progress and watch them go

Well done.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

QF: (8) Katie Swan WR 363 beat Ana Veselinovic (MNE) WR 441 (CH 329 in September 2007) 6-3 6-3

SF: (8) Katie Swan WR 363 vs (6) Chanel Simmonds (RSA) WR 330 (CH 158 in May 2013)



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

The questioning was valid; this is Katie's best week in about half a year.
It's her second $25K SF of the year, after Irapuato in week 15. It's also the first time she's won more than 2 matches in a week since then.
So, a welcome uptick.

Sixth seed, Simmonds, in the Semi.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

That win also means we have won as many matches this week as we had active players (17), and that's one more win in total than last week; just spread far more thinly.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55448
Date:

We're guaranteed a champion in the doubles as both Harriet+ and Daneika+ make the finals !!! :)

Semifinal



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Saturday 16th of September 2017 06:07:30 AM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

A word on Daneika: this is a pretty remarkable run.
She's mostly a coach now, at Columbia (if this is current: www.gocolumbialions.com/ViewArticle.dbml )
A decent US college doubles player, but this is just her second pro event in 3 years, following one in June (where she went out in doubles QR1!).
Also, she's played pro tournaments since 2009 in one capacity or another. This is just her second final of any description in all of that time.
A remarkable littel run, and a nice story. With apologies to Harriet (and Maria, who is lovely), I kinda hope Daneika completes the 'Cinderella story' and takes the title.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55448
Date:

It's a lovely feel-good story for Dani, blob.

Can't help feeling the 'remarkable run' is rather more to do with her partner, who is WR 441, ex 329, in singles.
And WR 279, ex 207, in doubles.

But you need two to play doubles so well done to both.

(My money's on Harriet and Maria though.....)





__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Thanks blob, I was wondering from where Dani had suddenly reappeared, and it is interesting to know. It is a remarkable sudden run, and even if CD is playing up her likely partner's role... well Ana wouldn't have agreed to play with Daneika if she didn't think she could play a bit! Will be an interesting final, though Harriet and Maria do seem to be playing well. They didn't give the #2 seeds much look in in the SFs.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13907
Date:

I watched Daneika before, she can definitely play. I'd have backed to be top 500 at the very least if she had given the tour a go after college.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

SF: (8) Katie Swan WR 363 lost to (6) Chanel Simmonds (RSA) WR 330 (CH 158 in May 2013) 4-1 to CS, retired

Must hope nothing too serious


__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard