Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 36 - ITF ($15K) - Hammamet, Tunisia Clay
KK


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 631
Date:
RE: Week 36 - ITF ($15K) - Hammamet, Tunisia Clay


I am supporting Fran here after all she has been through.  Keeping fingers crossed.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

Fran 6-3 *2-2

Her second serve stats are remarkable. Now 10/14 (71%), which with 4 DFs means 100% when it drops in. Or conversely Emily's taking advantage of second serves is awful.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

Jinxed that, she dropped one. Now 11/17 (65%) with 5 DFs.

By the way 5 DFs in 7 service games is not far of the rate that had Tara described elsewhere as showing "horrible form".

6-3 3-2*



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

A big fall off from the first set where Fran only had 1 DF. She has perhaps tensed up more this set, and Emily now has her first break, so 6-3 3-4* to Fran. Three sets looking more likely now.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

Is Fran a player known to rather go for her second serve? The stats today would still have her overall looking pretty good for second serve points won % in spite of her DFs.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Now it gets interesting, Emily broken back whilst serving for the set, 6-3 5-5 to Fran now

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1258
Date:

Emily took the second set 7-5

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 23368
Date:

3-3 in the third - all breaks of serve

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Have just looked again and now it is a completely different match to the first set. Serving stats for both players have fallen through the roof and thus far in the third set there have been 6 service breaks and no holds! 6-3 5-7 3-3 overall, Fran first. First hold may indeed win it.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Still no holds, both players having won only 5 points on their serve in this set. Emily serving again 3-4* up

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Finally a hold to Emily, *3-5 up in the third. Will that be enough?

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

It is, three holds to finish and congratulations to both Emily as winner, and Fran for a fantastic match and tournament too

F: Emily ARBUTHNOTT (8) 767 beat Francesca JONES 1092 3-6 7-5 6-4 smilesmile 

 

 



-- Edited by Michael D on Sunday 10th of September 2017 11:53:22 AM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Very well done to Emily on her second pro singles title
Commiserations to Fran; a third seed of the week just a little too much to overcome. A wonderful tournament nonetheless, and hopefully her first title will not be long in coming.

And that caps the best week of the year for the GB ladies by a wide distance.
NgNmINW.png

Well done all.
Now... let's have another just like it!



__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

Excellent win for Emily. The close result emphasises how good Fran is at 16 ie. easily on a par with a top 100 US college player, in my opinion because of the vagaries of the college ranking system and the depth at Stanford probably on a par with a player ranked about 50. .

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40894
Date:

Well done to Emily for the title and indeed well done to Fran for such a week. Pity her serve level dropped ( though both did to an extent ), though while falling from its early very high level her second serves won % still ended the one stat in which she was ahead.

Fran started the week by beating the WR 303 top seed ( WR 133 at the start of the year ) and finished with such a competitive match with Emily. Emily is clearly ( and still will be after these title points are added ) very underranked, such is her limited schedule, and as Oakland points to seems to be underranked in college terms too.



__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard