It's beginning to look suspiciously as though John Peers is faring better in partnership with Henri Kontinen (through to the semi-final) than Jamie is with Bruno...
It's beginning to look suspiciously as though John Peers is faring better in partnership with Henri Kontinen (through to the semi-final) than Jamie is with Bruno...
Henri Kontinen and John Peers have been doing better than Jamie and Bruno of late yes, but overall the last couple of years with Bruno have certainly been really good. And who's to say what would have happened if the Jamie / John pair had continued. Jamie at least apparently sought a change and I rather doubt he regrets it.
Two slam titles and ATP #1 pair for last year. That's success !!
It's beginning to look suspiciously as though John Peers is faring better in partnership with Henri Kontinen (through to the semi-final) than Jamie is with Bruno...
It's beginning to look suspiciously as though John Peers is faring better in partnership with Henri Kontinen (through to the semi-final) than Jamie is with Bruno...
Jamie & Bruno, down to live ranked 9 & 10 respectively, will fall further to 11 & 12 if Rojer & Tecau win the title ( they would fall just behind R & T ). Will stay 9 & 10 if los Lopez win the title ( although again be quite close ).
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 7th of September 2017 09:41:26 PM
Jamie & Bruno, down to live ranked 9 & 10 respectively, will fall further to 11 & 12 if Rojer & Tecau win the title ( they would fall just behind R & T ). Will stay 9 & 10 if los Lopez win the title ( although again be quite close ).