Futures is pushing it slightly, no? (And the Lucky Loser, who I'd agree owes Mr Murray quite a lot, is ranked 59 and has been in the third round twice already ... but yes, point taken!) For myself, I'd like to see Goffin making a big run (Monfils is another favourite, but Goffin had such rotten luck at RG just when he was doing so well), Kevin Anderson come out of his quarter (another person who's struggled after multiple injuries and made a slow, careful return) ... and ... oh, I'll go for Juan Martin del P to come out of the quarter in the draw that has as many Slam winners as the whole rest of it put together. And yes, I know that's only two ... but it sounds impressive. And seriously, that quarter, with Federer (even injured), Lopez, Mannarino, RBA, Juan Martin del Potro and Thiem, is actually still quite a tricky one. I have probably now ensured that all of the above picks will lose in the 3rd round
As for Mr Edmund's quarter, I'd love to see him through ... but with Shapovalov, PCB, Pouille and Cilic in the quarter, I'd be very pleasantly surprised.
-- Edited by Spectator on Friday 1st of September 2017 08:13:46 AM
I know we are now halfway through R2 but I did mention that I had been tabulating the ages of the 64 players through to R2 and the results are :
18 & 19 : 3 ( Shapovalov, Fritz and Rublev ) 20 to 23 : 9 ( includes two 22 yos - Cam and Kyle ) 24 to 27 : 13 28 to 31: 23 32 to 35 : 15 ( includes four 35 yos ) 36 : 1 ( Federer )
The 24 to 27s had a pretty late relative surge but still just over the total 23 and under, just over half of these 28 to 31 and less than these 32 to 35.
For info the year to years splits from 18 to 36 were : 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4, 9, 6, 3, 5, 4, 5, 2, 4, 1
The 9 is for age 28, which was the median age. 34 were aged 28 or less, 30 aged 29 or more.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 31st of August 2017 04:40:43 PM
For all some of the younger players' results the overall profile of the last 32 is probably even a bit older. Although the 32-35 group lost most of its number 3 of the remaining 5 are aged 35, the Fed group kept 100% of its number and the big 28-31 group had a good round. And the much maligned ( by me anyway ) 24-27 group dropped to 5.
And on a US Open related side note (SC, you may wish to avert your eyes at this point) ... I and others - based on my recollection of others' posts - had always assumed that Tennys Sandgren's name was the result of parents with more enthusiasm for tennis than was helpful for their progeny. But in among the US Open tweets, there was one with a video of Mr Sandgren: twitter.com/TennisChannel/status/902523806354350080. And it turns out that his name is actually a family inheritance from his grandfather, who had nothing whatsoever to do with tennis. I'm not clear whether it was his grandfather's first name or the result of what seems to be a fairly common US tradition of using last names as first names ... but either way, his parents are blameless.
I actually knew that - saw on it here, I think, some time ago, so I gneerally bite my tongue when I see the name mentioned. Doesn't stop me grinding my teeth at each mention, though...
ESPN saying that if Shapovalov were to win this one, he would be the youngest player in the last 16 of the US Open since Michael Chang in 1989. If he is going to achieve that though, he will have to do it from a set down as Kyle takes the opener 6-3.
L32: Kyle Edmund WR 42 v (Q) Dennis Shapovalov WR 69 (CH 67 Aug 2017)
First set in the bag by 6-3.
Bob: his first name is actually spelt "Denis".
Clearly his parents' spelling is even worse than mine.
Doubt it: Denis is a popular Christian name in French-speaking countries & is derived from that of the name of the Greek god, Dionysus. It's the ignorant Anglophones who seem to have added an extra "n". I automatically spell it the French way unless I know better.