Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 29 - USA F24 ($25,000) - Champaign, IL (hard)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:
RE: Week 29 - USA F24 ($25,000) - Champaign, IL (hard)


Stircrazy wrote:
brendan wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Jonathan Binding and Italian partner made it into the doubles main draw, as ALTs, but it was to play the second seeds.

They lost 6-3 6-2, but at least get a 90 dollar cheque each, which will cover a new pair of sneakers, or whatever ....


 we call them trainers


 smile


Strangely enough, in Brazil they are called "Tennis".

Went in to a shop called Tennis World and there wasn't a racket or a ball in sight but just training shoes.  It was only later that I discovered that "Tennis" was the Portuguese word for trainers (or sneakers, in CDs case).



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

QF:  (1) Farris Gosea & Manuel Sánchez (MEX) CR 1261 (453+808) vs Harrison Adams & Yates Johnson (USA/USA) UNR (0 [but a CH of 764 in September 2012]+713)

The American boys' parents were obviously firm believers in using surnames as first names!  rolleyes.gif



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55572
Date:

In France, they're called 'tennis' too - bizarre really, coz tennis itself is called tennis (obviously!) but so are the shoes.....(I think it's because technically they are 'chaussures de tennis' and the 'shoes' bit has just got dropped).
I can go with sneakers, or trainers, I was just in 'US' mode for the 'US' thread

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 527
Date:

as a site dedicated to British tennis I see it as a haven from social media that is dominated by Americanisms so it riles me if I see it here



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

brendan wrote:

as a site dedicated to British tennis I see it as a haven from social media that is dominated by Americanisms so it riles me if I see it here


 ????? 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

brendan wrote:

as a site dedicated to British tennis I see it as a haven from social media that is dominated by Americanisms so it riles me if I see it her

wow that's deep! 

The irony is American is closer to Olde English than conversational English as spoken in the U.K. because of so much integration of European languages

William Chester Minor an incaracarated American surgeon (Broadmoor for murder) helped define English as the major contributor to our first comprehensive English dictionary the Oxford English Dictionary.

so dream on, language is alive even pedants can't kill it. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41024
Date:

Yes, more generally, what I never understand is why some folk are so very antagonistic to "Americanisms". Language evolves and they speak the English language, yes really, and are as entitled to add to the evolution as anyone.

So if we have an occasional development ( and again I am being serious ) such as "my bad" so what or if the odd existing more Americanism like "sneakers" pops in I think we can we live. CD's "sneakers" may have deserved a joshing comment from someone, but "riled by", really ?

We may be a British tennis site, we are also on the whole very tolerant of how people express themselves.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5134
Date:

I may be talking rubbish but I won't be at all suprised if "my bad" isn't very olde! A bit like the American use of good which was prevelant in Olde English. All great fun. Teenage evolution of language is also very interesting, Steven is probably a "meme"

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

Oakland2002 wrote:

I may be talking rubbish but I won't be at all suprised if "my bad" isn't very olde! A bit like the American use of good which was prevelant in Olde English. All great fun. Teenage evolution of language is also very interesting, Steven is probably a "meme"


You are, Oakland:

This slang term originated in about 1970.

Speakers of "Olde English" at least had the good sense (brains!) to finish off their sentences & wouldn't, I feel, have dreamt of coming out with such ugly, lazy, unfinished phrases as "looks like...", "get rid..." or "soon as...". 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55572
Date:

I really didn't mean to start a language offensive when I innocently used the word 'sneakers' I could just as well have used 'trainers' (but isn't there something rather nice to the ear about the word 'sneakers'?).

Like several above, I find the development of language (and languages themselves) very interesting - and certainly there's lots of VERY ugly, lazy and unfinished phrases in Essex English, just to take a homegrown example.

And after all, the word 'trainer' (for the shoe) is pretty new - an abbreviation, I believe, of 'training shoe' and only coming into existence when 'plimsoll' sort of died out (because they were no longer canvas?).

I like diversity of language, it's part of people's individuality. And I rather like the hotchpotch version that many people now have, with a bit from all over the place.





__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

[...] but isn't there something rather nice to the ear about the word 'sneakers'?


Not to these English ears! no  The word is a Yank abomination!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55572
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

[...] but isn't there something rather nice to the ear about the word 'sneakers'?


Not to these English ears! no  The word is a Yank abomination!


 Musically, I meant - ignoring the meaning, and connections, doesn't it just sound nice ??? 

Or maybe it's just me....smile



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

QF:  Harrison Adams & Yates Johnson (USA/USA) UNR (0+713) defeated (1) Farris Gosea & Manuel Sánchez (MEX) CR 1261 (453+808) by 6-3 7-6(2)  bleh



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard