Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 24 - ATP 250 - Ricoh Open, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands (grass)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41015
Date:
Week 24 - ATP 250 - Ricoh Open, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands (grass)


We can toss this ATP vs Challenger level player thing about till kingdom come, but basically there is no accepted definition that I know.

To me Aljaz at his ranking level and competitive and winning a fair deal of matches at ATP level is an ATP level player as are Kyle and Dan.

Jaggy puts this higher at top 40 or 50 and apparently with an overall ATP winning record.

I think the former more logical but as far as I can tell doubt I can convince of that and nor will I be convinced otherwise.



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1842
Date:

indiana wrote:

We can toss this ATP vs Challenger level player thing about till kingdom come, but basically there is no accepted definition that I know.

To me Aljaz at his ranking level and competitive and winning a fair deal of matches at ATP level is an ATP level player as are Kyle and Dan.

Jaggy puts this higher at top 40 or 50 and apparently with an overall ATP winning record.

I think the former more logical but as far as I can tell doubt I can convince of that and nor will I be convinced otherwise.


... and why on earth would anyone think that it mattered?

I don't understand the desire to fit someone into a box with a label on it - preferably as pejorative a label as can be imagined - simply in order to provoke.

Being labelled "an ATP level player" in someone's post doesn't make them any more or less likely to win - or lose - a match than if the label "Challenger level" had been applied to that person.

There is a similar tendency to label "ball-basher" as if it made a difference to the number of points that a person gets when/ if they win.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55569
Date:

Yes, chrisT.

It's lost on me, too.

Is there a difference between an ATP-player? And someone who plays ATP? (And, if so, for the love of Mike, what????)

Because Aljaz is certainly the second. So isn't he the first too?

I think it's all done to tease



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:

By the same measure then, there are lots of Futures players in Challengers. Which makes it more baffling why our guys playing in Challengers can't prosper and win titles at that level. Unless they themselves are all futures players of course.

We need one of our experts to do some number crunching. I suspect that throughout the year, around 31.8% of Challenger draws are made up of Challenger players. The rest are largely a dastardly bunch of fraudsters, imposters and chancers thet need to be weeded out by the Tennis Integrity Unit. Frequently debasing the quality and reputation of Challenger level tournaments and always asking to borrow money in the locker room.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58109
Date:

L16:  (8) Aljaz Bedene WR 59 vs Ernesto Escobedo (USA) WR 77 (CH = 73 in April)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17432
Date:

Didn't realise Ernesto had got that high up the rankings.....

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 618
Date:

H2H is 1-0 to Aljaz and by coincidence that meeting was at this very event 1 year ago just in the first round rather than the second. Aljaz triumphed 7-6 6-2 that day but Escobedo is making good progress and will likely prove a tougher out this time around.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58109
Date:

Make the head-to-head 2-0:

L16:  (8) Aljaz Bedene WR 59 defeated Ernesto Escobedo (USA) WR 77 by 3 & 4  smile



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

good win for Aljaz. Muller or Seppi next - both strong on grass, Seppi no slouch - won Eastsbourne 2011, RU 2012 and Halle RU as well!

__________________
JonH
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7970
Date:

Good news - well done Aljaz!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58109
Date:

QF:  (8) Aljaz Bedene WR 59 vs (4) Gilles Müller (LUX) WR 28 (CH = 26 last month)



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6871
Date:

Nice win for Aljaz - level for the week - one more win could be very handy smile



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13909
Date:

Bad start for Ali 0-2*.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23477
Date:

First set slips away 6-4. Serve not working well in the early stages - only 35% first serves in the first set

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58109
Date:

the addict wrote:

First set slips away 6-4.


3-6, actually.  wink



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard