Thiem was good and Djoko not injured but after the first set the lights were on but nobody at home - a complete collapse. Don't think he got a backhand in court for the final 2 sets.
You predicted the outcome correctly, but the scoreline was a bit off: Thiem has just seen off Djoko in straight sets: 7-6(5) 6-3 6-0, while Rafa despatched Carreño by 6-2 2-0 retired. Djoko injured or Thiem just too good? Either way, it would now seem to be Andy's best chance of lifting the French Open title...
Nah.
His best chances have been when he was actually in great form. He seems to be getting back to a higher level this week, but he's still far from the level he was at this time last year and Nadal is in ominous form. I suspect Nishikori may prove to have too much for him today.
I certainly agree that last year was a much better chance than this yet looks realistically. But very decent chance to reach the SF if his game is coming much more together.
Andy will do well to get through Nishikori and then presumably Stan but if he does then he has a shot. If he can make the final he has to hope Thiem and Nadal go 5 sets and burn a ton of energy in the semi final so that the winner is suitably softened up for him.
Stu Fraser's article in today's Times is headed "Lendl works his magic by taking Murray back to basics". First paragraph:
The source of Andy Murray's resurgence at the French Open can be traced to the return of Ivan Lendl, the straight-talking Czech coach who is back in the corutside box of the world No 1 for the first time in four months.
Then a little later:
Ever the perfectionist, Murray had started desperately tinkering with elements of his preparation in an effort to stop the rot. However, the arrival of the blunt Lendl, who had not working in person with Murray since the Australian Open, soon brought an end to all that.
"When things are not going well, you start to overthink things," Murray said. "You start wanting to try noew things on the practice court, changing tensions in your racket. You think about all sorts of things to try to work out what is going wrong. [...]"
He apparently feels he is in better physical shape compared with the quarter-final stage last year. Let's hope so!
Think most of us love the variation Andy can bring. But his best success has just been playing extremely good functional tennis under Mr Lendl.
Improvisation is a back up that can help him out at times better than others. But it is not a basis just as excellent defense was never a true basis and rather Lendl indoctrinated controlled agression made him a champion.
-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 7th of June 2017 05:40:26 PM
Murray v Nishikori is always a interesting match up. Andy's big weapon is his returning, but because Nishikori's serve is soo poor(wta standard) Murray cannot take advantage.
Nishikori was unplayable that first set. The 2nd set terrible. The big turning point could be the time violation that Murray had it's ironically benefitted him.